Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 3

  • Design and Construction Standards (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 14 June 2006
    Will the aim be to try and link the targets established in the supplementary guidance?
  • Design and Construction Standards (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 14 June 2006
    In terms of renewable energy, the preferred standard in the Mayor's guidance that major developments should be zero carbon emissions, which goes considerably higher than was in the original bid proposal. Is there an opportunity, with the new planning permission coming forward, to actually increase the renewable component in some of the developments?
  • Design and Construction Standards

    • Reference: 2006/0106-1
    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 14 June 2006
    Will all the Olympics developments meet the Preferred Standards in the Mayor's Supplementary Planning Guidance on Sustainable Design and Construction?
  • Step Change and Public Expectations (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 10 December 2003
    What sort of increase have we seen?
  • Incinerators

    • Reference: 2002/0231-1
    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    Is the Mayor's waste strategy strong enough to avoid the need for new incinerators in London? .
  • Waste Minimisation and Reduction

    • Reference: 2002/0234-1
    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    Are the Mayor's advisors committed to a strong policy for waste minimisation and reduction? .
  • Implementation and Partnerships (Supplementary) [14]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    Just quickly on the wheelie bins. Is it not the question of how large or small the wheelie bins are and that local authorities have tended to invest in wheelie bins that have turned out to be far too big, that people can shove everything in. If instead they had gone for smaller bins it would have created a lot less problems. When they look at replacing bins, as part of the general replacement programme, they need to look at the smaller size in place of the big ones.
  • New Combustion Technologies

    • Reference: 2001/0237-1
    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 14 November 2001
    Are you aware that the Thermoselect HTR (High Temperature Recycling) flagship Plant at Karlsruhe, (quoted in the Draft Waste Strategy as having `emissions of less than 10% of those permitted by the German Regulations') was closed down in October 2000 for at least seven months because of a breach of German emission regulations? How will this affect the Waste Strategy's stance on new combustion technologies? .
  • Effective Working Partnerships (Supplementary) [14]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 14 November 2001
    So other changes will be made during the public consultation stage, not during the Assembly consultation stage? You'll really just be noting the London Waste Action stakeholder dialogue comments at the moment, you won't be making any changes on those until they go to public consultation?
  • New Combustion Technologies (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 14 November 2001
    So you think there's generally no problem then? It's the sort of plant that you'd like to see research in for getting in to London then?