Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

Meeting type

Organisation 1

Question by

Status

Year

  • Question and Answer Session: London Development Agency Settlement

    • Reference: 2011/0076-1
    • Question by: Dee Doocey
    • Meeting date: 16 March 2011
    Simon, you wanted to make an opening statement. Thank you very much for coming along.

  • Question and Answer Session: London Development Agency Settlement

    • Reference: 2011/0077-1
    • Question by: Dee Doocey
    • Meeting date: 16 March 2011
    Dee Doocey (Chair): Simon, you wanted to make an opening statement. Thank you very much for coming along.

  • Question and Answer Session: Mayoral Development Corporation

    • Reference: 2011/0078-1
    • Question by: Dee Doocey
    • Meeting date: 16 March 2011
    Dee Doocey (Chair): We are now moving on to the session on the Mayoral Development Corporation (MDC). Can I start off the session by asking you, Simon, please can you explain the Mayor's proposals to create a MDC for the Olympic Park area?

  • Question and Answer Session: London Development Agency Settlement (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 16 March 2011
    Can I just understand the numbers a bit better. You talked about the £56 million that was all that was committed up to now but we have got £85.6 million in the budgets for this current year. Is that £85.6 million funded or is there now more in this current year, 2011/12, than that number?

  • Question and Answer Session: London Development Agency Settlement (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 16 March 2011
    Can I just understand the numbers a bit better. You talked about the £56 million that was all that was committed up to now but we have got £85.6 million in the budgets for this current year. Is that £85.6 million funded or is there now more in this current year, 2011/12, than that number?

  • Question and Answer Session: Mayoral Development Corporation (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Caroline Pidgeon
    • Meeting date: 16 March 2011
    To pick up from what John was asking you, will you ensure that borough councillors and borough representatives will be on the new Board and representatives of the local communities?

  • Question and Answer Session: Mayoral Development Corporation (Supplementary) [7]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 16 March 2011
    In the minute or two left I do not have the time to debate the sweep of the abolition of the Greater London Council (GLC) because it was too interventionist, the strategic role this body was meant to have and now a much more interventionist, but I think many of us round here would be very concerned at planning powers being taken off boroughs as a way of doing business. First question then, very quickly, do you agree that, if we are to go down this MDC route, there should be a very tight set of objectives and time limited...

  • Legacy

    • Reference: 2009/0117-1
    • Question by: Dee Doocey
    • Meeting date: 21 October 2009
    Do you believe that your employment targets for local people will provide the legacy that was promised in Singapore?

  • Budget and Venues Update (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Dee Doocey
    • Meeting date: 10 November 2007
    Just to be absolutely clear, the £1 billion, plus the inflation, will, in your view, not be exceeded in order to build these permanent and temporary facilities and to upgrade and to turn them into legacy mode, is that correct?

  • Budget and Venues Update (Supplementary) [25]

    • Question by: Dee Doocey
    • Meeting date: 10 November 2007
    I have got two questions. The first is for John Armitt; could I bring you back to the budget please, and just for clarity I am talking about the £9.3 billion budget. Within that budget you have allocated just over £1 billion for venues. The press reported that the stadium costs have gone up to £500 million and that proved correct. They are also saying that the Aquatics Centre has gone up to £150 million so I am assuming, for the purpose of this discussion, that that is also correct. If that is the case it means that you have...