Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

  • Budget and Venues Update (Supplementary) [9]

    • Question by: Angie Bray
    • Meeting date: 10 November 2007
    You knew about that. I mean, everybody knew about the land.
  • Budget and Venues Update (Supplementary) [15]

    • Question by: Angie Bray
    • Meeting date: 10 November 2007
    My final point is this: the people who have been taken for a ride here are the public, aren't they? Part of the design of that bid document was for public consumption, to ensure that opinion polls did not race away against the idea of the Olympic Games in the first place as it might have made us an unpopular venue as far as the IOC was concerned. It was the public that was being lulled into a false sense of security about this when all along the professionals and those who are used to this kind of bidding knew...
  • Budget and Venues Update (Supplementary) [32]

    • Question by: Angie Bray
    • Meeting date: 10 November 2007
    I am sorry, but all that was known and we all knew about the fact that it was also about regeneration. What I am saying is I think the public will feel that they have been taken for a very large ride, particularly when people now say, 'Oh yeah, that was just to win the bid.' It just does not allow the public to feel very confident that they are being treated like grown ups, does it?
  • Budget and Venues Update (Supplementary) [38]

    • Question by: Angie Bray
    • Meeting date: 10 November 2007
    This is a question to David Higgins. There was something you said earlier and I just want to go back to it very briefly. I recognise that you came to this after the initial stage, after we had won the bid but I find it vaguely depressing when you say, as you have done in the past, 'Oh yes, well, the plans for the Aquatics Centre - it was all a bit vague. That was in the bid document in order to help us win the bid.' Don't you think that it actually brings the whole process into disrepute, that...
  • Budget (Supplementary) [15]

    • Question by: Angie Bray
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    We were assured at the time by the Mayor and everybody else that that was a robust costing. So you can imagine how depressed we feel when it turns out not to have been anything of the sort.
  • Stratford City (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Geoff Pope
    • Meeting date: 14 June 2006
    Is there an element of you saying, `Well if some of this expansion does not take place, then it is not that critical because there is already a reasonable transport network'? Is that how I take that?
  • Stratford City (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Geoff Pope
    • Meeting date: 14 June 2006
    Are you aware that when we had an investigation into the new North London Railway about the expansion, which is planned for 2011, that the North London Borough Transport officers were highly sceptical as to whether the infrastructure could be delivered by 2012.
  • Stratford City (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Geoff Pope
    • Meeting date: 14 June 2006
    What sort of risk assessments will you be putting in these various transport upgrades to try to assess where any weaknesses might occur?
  • Stratford City (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Geoff Pope
    • Meeting date: 14 June 2006
    What sort of risk assessments will you be putting in these various transport upgrades to try to assess where any weaknesses might occur?
  • Stratford City (Supplementary) [11]

    • Question by: Geoff Pope
    • Meeting date: 14 June 2006
    Thank you. Would you regard the transport plans as being ambitious? In the scheme of the whole project, I am trying to gauge if you feel that transport is more perhaps at risk than other aspects.