Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • Olympics Park and Venues (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 25 April 2007
    So you are guaranteeing that we are seeing no reduction whatsoever in the amount of public open space?
  • Olympics Park and Venues (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 25 April 2007
    So the other pieces of public open space which are not contained in this application will be in other applications or have been agreed already?
  • Olympics Park and Venues (Supplementary) [8]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 25 April 2007
    Thank you. David [Higgins] mentioned the size of the Park earlier, but the new planning application does reduce the amount of open space in the Park by the equivalent of 34 football pitches, from 127 hectares to 109 hectares. The application is smaller than the previous one. We are getting a smaller park are we not?
  • Olympics Park and Venues (Supplementary) [9]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 25 April 2007
    OK, thanks. If I can briefly move on now to sustainability standards? Last month the Mayor told us that now the budget had been agreed, we can expect improvements in the environmental standards for the Olympics. What changes will be made now that you have the money in the budget?
  • Olympics Park and Venues

    • Reference: 2007/0024-1
    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 25 April 2007
    Planned expenditure on the park and venues has risen from £2.4bn to £3.1bn in the last two years. What long-term benefits will Londoners see as a result of this extra money?
  • Incinerators

    • Reference: 2002/0231-1
    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    Is the Mayor's waste strategy strong enough to avoid the need for new incinerators in London? .
  • Waste Minimisation and Reduction

    • Reference: 2002/0234-1
    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    Are the Mayor's advisors committed to a strong policy for waste minimisation and reduction? .
  • Implementation and Partnerships (Supplementary) [14]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    Just quickly on the wheelie bins. Is it not the question of how large or small the wheelie bins are and that local authorities have tended to invest in wheelie bins that have turned out to be far too big, that people can shove everything in. If instead they had gone for smaller bins it would have created a lot less problems. When they look at replacing bins, as part of the general replacement programme, they need to look at the smaller size in place of the big ones.
  • New Combustion Technologies

    • Reference: 2001/0237-1
    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 14 November 2001
    Are you aware that the Thermoselect HTR (High Temperature Recycling) flagship Plant at Karlsruhe, (quoted in the Draft Waste Strategy as having `emissions of less than 10% of those permitted by the German Regulations') was closed down in October 2000 for at least seven months because of a breach of German emission regulations? How will this affect the Waste Strategy's stance on new combustion technologies? .
  • Effective Working Partnerships (Supplementary) [14]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 14 November 2001
    So other changes will be made during the public consultation stage, not during the Assembly consultation stage? You'll really just be noting the London Waste Action stakeholder dialogue comments at the moment, you won't be making any changes on those until they go to public consultation?