And there are long term plans for financing these facilities beyond the Games, because, as we know, swimming pools for instance, are very expensive for somebody to take on, long term?
So, for instance, in Hackney, there will be the opportunity for local communities perhaps to take over football fields, pitches and that sort of thing there?
I was listening to what you were saying to John Biggs and I take on board that you have steering groups of all sorts looking at how you develop the facilities with their legacy beyond the Games in mind. Can I just seek some clarification then? Are you saying that you already have teams of people in place who are organising proper financial and business plans for these venues, so they can be seamlessly transferred after the Games to groups who will then be taking them on to use them in the future?
So, it is rather a meaningless figure, is it not, actually in reality, because it does not give a true picture of those people who need to be helped into work.
Have any LDA strategies needed to be changed due to the Mayor not receiving extra powers over the functions of London's Learning and Skills Council(s)?
The DCLG's paper on the GLA's powers said the role of the LDA in the next round of European Structural Fund Programmes, due to start on 31st December 2006, were the subject of ongoing discussions. Have these discussions concluded, and what was the outcome?