Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • Olympics Park and Venues (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 25 April 2007
    So you are guaranteeing that we are seeing no reduction whatsoever in the amount of public open space?
  • Olympics Park and Venues (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 25 April 2007
    So the other pieces of public open space which are not contained in this application will be in other applications or have been agreed already?
  • Olympics Park and Venues (Supplementary) [8]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 25 April 2007
    Thank you. David [Higgins] mentioned the size of the Park earlier, but the new planning application does reduce the amount of open space in the Park by the equivalent of 34 football pitches, from 127 hectares to 109 hectares. The application is smaller than the previous one. We are getting a smaller park are we not?
  • Olympics Park and Venues (Supplementary) [9]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 25 April 2007
    OK, thanks. If I can briefly move on now to sustainability standards? Last month the Mayor told us that now the budget had been agreed, we can expect improvements in the environmental standards for the Olympics. What changes will be made now that you have the money in the budget?
  • Olympics Park and Venues

    • Reference: 2007/0024-1
    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 25 April 2007
    Planned expenditure on the park and venues has risen from £2.4bn to £3.1bn in the last two years. What long-term benefits will Londoners see as a result of this extra money?
  • Budget (Supplementary) [7]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    But you cannot give a guarantee?
  • Budget (Supplementary) [12]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    Okay, so the environment is a major feature, but we may have to see some scaling down on the bid commitments because of cost overruns?
  • Budget (Supplementary) [16]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    On the budget issue, we saw environmental and legacy commitments being scaled back in Athens as a result of going over budget. Can you give an absolute guarantee that there will be no scaling back in London from what was promised in the bid documents?
  • Renewable Energy

    • Reference: 2006/0104-1
    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 14 June 2006
    Existing planning permission for the Stratford City development specifies that a minimum of 2% of energy requirements of the development be provided from locally resourced renewable energy. This is a long way short of the commitment in Towards a One Planet Olympics for an 'Athletes' Village capable of being energy self-sufficient'. As part of the Athletes' Village will now be sited within the Stratford City development, will the ODA seek new planning permission, specifying the Athletes' Village as a Zero-Energy Development? If not, how will the ODA ensure that the Athletes' Village is "energy self -sufficient"?