Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 4

  • Question and Answer Session: Cost of Living

    • Reference: 2022/3839
    • Question by: Chair, London Assembly
    • Meeting date: 03 November 2022
    What cost of living pressures are Londoners facing and how can they be tackled?
  • Protecting Londoners' human rights

    • Reference: 2017/3584
    • Question by: Siân Berry
    • Meeting date: 14 September 2017
    With increases in the number of Metropolitan Police officers armed with firearms and tasers, and the use of intrusive tactics such as spit hoods and stop and search, what steps are you taking to ensure the human rights of all Londoners are respected?
  • Mayor's manifesto commitments (Supplementary) [7]

    • Question by: Siân Berry
    • Meeting date: 07 December 2016
    Sian Berry AM: I would like to ask for some quick clarification on some of the details of the London Living Rent homes within your funding programme, if that is OK. This product is not quite what renters were expecting. It is very similar to the Government’s existing Rent to Buy Scheme, which is not suitable for everyone. I wanted to ask. The Government’s Rent to Buy Scheme requires a good credit rating. Can you reassure Londoners worried that their credit history might hinder their ability to apply for London Living Rent homes that they will not need to have...
  • Priorities for the Coming Year (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Murad Qureshi
    • Meeting date: 10 November 2007
    Just going on from John's [Biggs] friendly question, you outlined many, many priorities for next year and, if anything, the first observation is maybe there are too many. Can you possibly lose focus as a result and what kind of managerial systems have you got to make sure that you can cover all the ground? For example, the two additional ones that I had were implementing the Mayor's Housing Strategy and the sporting provision and the youth service. Now those are clearly new areas on top of your Olympic responsibilities, as well as the climate change work.
  • London City Airport (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Geoff Pope
    • Meeting date: 10 November 2007
    Can you say anything about the timescale of this application?
  • Community Fire Safety Work (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Angie Bray
    • Meeting date: 08 November 2006
    I appreciate one size does not fit all and I totally agree with that. Would it be fair to say that the way to go forward would be where there is an excellent product, that you would like to use best practice principles in order to extend those practices across the capital?
  • Community Fire Safety Work (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Angie Bray
    • Meeting date: 08 November 2006
    You will obviously keep us updated as you make your progress round?
  • Community Fire Safety Work (Supplementary) [7]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 08 November 2006
    Indeed. That is showing up in the home safety checks which I think have risen from around 9,000 a couple of years ago to approximately 20,000 in the year that has just ended and the target for the current year is approximately 30,000. Even if you add all that up, that is 40,000-50,000 home safety checks. One or two per cent of Londoners have had a home safety check. Should we not be looking for a real huge step forward in this area?
  • Responding to Flooding (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 08 November 2006
    On the Thames Gateway development issues, you said you have not specifically commented on the flood risk issue. Could I ask that LFEPA does look at the recommendations from the Assembly's Environment Committee that the plans be rigorously tested?
  • Responding to Flooding (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 08 November 2006
    Even if that is not going to be a statutory function, obviously there is a direct pressure that flood risk places on LFEPA's activities. Should you not be pressing for stronger planning policies to limit new development in high-risk flood areas, and actually really take a key part in this debate about Thames Gateway?