Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • Question & Answer Session: London's Long-Term Infrastructure Needs (Supplementary) [17]

    • Question by: Neil Garratt
    • Meeting date: 08 June 2023
    Neil Garratt AM: Hello, again. Two quick things, Seb. Firstly, I wanted to thank you for letting us know where the Mayor was this morning, because he himself did not tell us. In fact, the reason that I bring this up in the way that I do is because he does not even tell us yes or no. The staff who organise these meetings send an email to his office saying, “Will you come along?” He does not even give them the courtesy of a reply. It is not your fault and I am not holding you responsible, but this...
  • Question & Answer Session: London's Long-Term Infrastructure Needs (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Neil Garratt
    • Meeting date: 08 June 2023
    Neil Garratt AM: Thank you, Chair. Morning, everyone. It is good to see you all here. I think it is a very important topic. I am duty-bound, it is now traditional that I have to point out that unfortunately the Mayor did not consider it important enough to come along, but thank you to all of you who have. If I could start with you, Sir John. It is picking up on a point that you raised in your opening remarks about almost every answer to decarbonisation looks like electrification. Therefore, while we talk about decarbonising our existing electrical supply...
  • Infrastructure in the Thames Gateway (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 17 March 2004
    A small point, returning to this question of the utilities infrastructure and whether you are in this rich mix of cooks and broths and magic wands talking to the regulators, Ofcom, Ofgem and all the other `ofs', because in the old days the utilities, the phone, gas and electricity companies would have been able to put the infrastructure in ahead of demand. Now they are working on a private model they can only put the investment in if there is a sure payback, unless the regulators tell them they have to do that. So are the regulators part of this?
  • Infrastructure in the Thames Gateway (Supplementary) [12]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 17 March 2004
    I saw that the LDA was putting a grant into some electricity substation, I cannot remember the details, and I thought `why is the LDA paying for electricity infrastructure?'
  • Infrastructure in the Thames Gateway (Supplementary) [13]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 17 March 2004
    As long as the money is coming back, because they are going to make money using it.
  • Regeneration/Environment (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 15 October 2003
    I am pleased with what you said about the registering of volunteers. I know that New York and some of the continental bids are perhaps a little ahead of us, so it is good to know where we are catching up. I wanted to press you a little harder. At the beginning you talked about getting the balance right between a winning bid and a bid that spreads the benefits around London and so forth. I am optimistic that is not a question of trading one off against the other. You said that part of the winning was about involving...