Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • Flood Management (Supplementary) [8]

    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 17 March 2004
    What you actually said to Jenny (Jones) was that the flood defences will have to be improved because of environmental factors: global warming, sinking land, and the fact that the risk will have increased by 2030. Of course, we do not just flick a switch and the risk doubles in 2030; the risk is increasing all the time incrementally towards that. But you did not say anything, with respect, about the risk management element, which has to take into account the value of what you are protecting as well as the risk of something happening. I am not convinced that...
  • Flood Management (Supplementary) [9]

    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 17 March 2004
    Nor, I assume, do you put your police stations and fire stations and hospitals and emergency services that will need to respond to a flood within the flood zone?
  • Flood Management (Supplementary) [10]

    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 17 March 2004
    Is there a plan which is going to ensure all these things are placed back from the area that is potentially in danger? How do you actually, when you are doing that, speak to local residents and businesses who are in the high risk area and assure them that, just because you have not got public facilities there, that does not meant it is a no-go area?
  • Infrastructure in the Thames Gateway (Supplementary) [10]

    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 17 March 2004
  • Single Waste Disposal Authority

    • Reference: 2002/0273-1
    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    The Draft Municipal Waste Strategy sets out a desire to create a single waste disposal authority for London. Bearing in mind many boroughs are already engaged in long-term waste contracts, how do you intend to create this single authority and how will it work? .
  • Recycling Rates (Supplementary) [13]

    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    John - both you and Nicky, as the Mayor's Waste Advisor, have told us at the Environment Committee, that the use of wheeled bins by boroughs actually reduces the amount of recycling. Now, from the borough's point of view, wheeled bins are useful because it reduces their cost of collection, and from the householder's point of view, they're convenient. So, are you actually planning, as a part of your approach to waste, to be reducing wheeled bins in London, or are you going to accept them as a reality?
  • Recycling Rates (Supplementary) [14]

    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    You say you would hesitate if a new wheeled bin scheme was proposed. What form of activity would that hesitation take?
  • Recycling Rates (Supplementary) [20]

    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    Well, either you think that wheeled bins are a bad thing and you're going to do something about it, or you're going to use them in a positive way, to help to improve people's recycling rates. I can think of several ways that you might actually modify a bin scheme to do that.
  • Recycling Rates (Supplementary) [21]

    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    Can you envisage yourself turning down a contract because of the size of wheeled bins?
  • Recycling Rates (Supplementary) [22]

    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    So, it's just words then, really, is it?