Search questions

• Reference: 2016/2844
• Question by: Navin Shah
• Meeting date: 07 September 2016

What impact has the removal of the second appliance from Willesden Fire Station had on a) the ward in which the station is located; b) the surrounding wards and c) the London Borough of Brent?

• Reference: 2016/2845
• Question by: Navin Shah
• Meeting date: 07 September 2016

What impact has the removal of the second appliance from Willesden Fire Station had on neighbouring boroughs?

• Reference: 2016/2846
• Question by: Navin Shah
• Meeting date: 07 September 2016

What has been the impact of the removal of the 13 appliances in outer London boroughs?

• Reference: 2016/2847
• Question by: Navin Shah
• Meeting date: 07 September 2016

During the consultation on the Brigade's 2016/17 budget, we were told that any inequalities arising from the removal of the 13 appliances would be addressed as part of LSP6. Do you anticipate any changes to resources in either Brent or Harrow?

• Question by: Navin Shah
• Meeting date: 07 September 2016

My question is to the Chair of the Fire Authority. Chair, the Fifth London Safety Plan (LSP5), the current one, allows for alternate crewing of some specialist appliances. Can you confirm or do you expect alternate crewing to be extended to LSP6 as well, please?

• Reference: 2005/0313-1
• Question by: Peter Hulme Cross
• Meeting date: 08 September 2005

The principal, major transport improvements expected before 2012 include: the completion of the Channel Tunnel Rail Link to St Pancras; north and south extensions and upgrades to the East London Line; longer trains, and extensions to the Docklands Light Railway; significant improvements to the transport hubs at Kings Cross/St Pancras and Stratford and the building of the West London tram. The successful bid also means that capacity on the North London Line will be greatly improved. Can you confirm that all these things will occur before 2012?

• Reference: 2005/0314-1
• Question by: Peter Hulme Cross
• Meeting date: 08 September 2005

Tessa Jowell has conceded that the security bill is likely to increase. Who will pay for it?

• Reference: 2005/0316-1
• Question by: Peter Hulme Cross
• Meeting date: 08 September 2005

The Big Lottery Fund, which distributes lottery money, has predicted that grants to causes such as health, education, environmental and volunteer programmes could be reduced by £68m over the next four years, as lottery players switch to the heavily marketed Olympic-themed game. Could this Olympic lottery simply divert monies from other causes - including local sporting developments of which much is made in current lottery propaganda?

• Reference: 2005/0317-1
• Question by: Peter Hulme Cross
• Meeting date: 08 September 2005

Building Design was obliged to obtain information about project funding under Freedom of Information legislation. We too are obliged to resort to FoI on the Olympic opinion polling. We are still chasing the information which was denied to us on grounds that giving it to us would affect public perception of opinion polling. Appreciating that the London Assembly has no role in the Olympic Games and is not even mentioned in the London Olympics Bill, can the Mayor explain who is to have the job of even the most rudeimentary form of scrutiny, looking after London's interests and avoiding the...

• Reference: 2005/0318-1
• Question by: Peter Hulme Cross
• Meeting date: 08 September 2005

In Singapore, in the final stages of the bidding process, Sebastian Coe promised immediate gains for sport in the UK if London were to be successful. Can these now be quantified?