Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

Category

Meeting type

Organisation

Question by

Status

Year

  • Jack Lemley (Supplementary) [16]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    When Mr Lemley left, as I recall, it was suggested that it was because of ill health. Is that correct?

  • Jack Lemley (Supplementary) [18]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    You do not know whether there was any provision that might give rise to discussion on that?

  • Jack Lemley (Supplementary) [19]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    I understand. Was there any payment made to Mr Lemley in relation to the termination of his position?

  • Jack Lemley (Supplementary) [20]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    I understand that. My concern here is that the credibility of the organisation is being challenged; first by the departure of Jack Lemley, then by Lord Rogers, and allegedly by the Mayor as well. That tends to suggest that there are serious problems undermining the whole organisation

  • Jack Lemley (Supplementary) [21]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    My final question is about money. Is there anything we need to know about the financial settlement associated with the departure of Mr Lemley? He was on a contract of something like £250,000 a year, maybe it was more than that.

  • Jack Lemley (Supplementary) [23]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    If you were to receive a number of written questions from the Assembly asking you to confirm or otherwise some of the more detailed points which seem to be squirming out in the press, would you be happy to receive those? Perhaps happy is not the right word.

  • Budget (Supplementary) [7]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    But you cannot give a guarantee?

  • Budget (Supplementary) [11]

    • Question by: Sally Hamwee
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    A discrete point, as it were. You have mentioned the need for an adequate contingency budget. I do not think any one would argue with that. Are you able to tell us, in terms of the percentage of the whole, what you would regard as an adequate percentage?

  • Budget (Supplementary) [12]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    Okay, so the environment is a major feature, but we may have to see some scaling down on the bid commitments because of cost overruns?

  • Budget (Supplementary) [13]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    Could I ask you one other impossible question to answer then which is when you have finally negotiated with the Treasury your revised budgets for the Olympics, and we agree a sum, will that be a fixed sum which we can be confident to go forward with until 2012?