Search questions

• Question by: Roger Evans
• Meeting date: 02 December 2015

Roger Evans AM: If you consider the 13 appliances that you are considering taking away plus the ones that were removed before, I believe the saving is around £25 million. If by some miracle you were to have £25 million returned to your budget, Commissioner, would you ideally spend it on putting those appliances back or would you have other priorities that you think would keep London safer?

• Question by: James Cleverly
• Meeting date: 02 December 2015

James Cleverly AM MP: I am happy for either the Commissioner or the Chairman to answer this. When the traditional disposition of London’s fire stations was brought about, I suppose, with the early 20th century expansion, is it fair to say that fire and fire risk was the single biggest driving factor in the equipment disposition of fire stations and fire appliances?

• Question by: Roger Evans
• Meeting date: 02 December 2015

Roger Evans AM: I just wanted to add my support to Jenny’s suggestion that fire prevention people might look at flood prevention as well. I wondered if there was also a role for them to do some joint working with the MPS on crime prevention because at the moment we have fire prevention people who go out and tell people largely to provide more means of exit and entrance from their properties and then crime prevention people who go around and tell them to lock them up. Might it not be better if the two services worked together and more...

• Question by: Andrew Boff
• Meeting date: 02 December 2015

Andrew Boff AM: On the subject of safety, on 25 November 2015 there was a fire at a tyre shop in Walpole Road, N17. This shop has now reopened. Is it standard practice for there to be an investigation or an inspection subsequent to an incident and could you write to me and say whether or not there has been an inspection of these particular premises? The reason I chase this with you is that there have been some concerns from local residents for a considerable period but they do not seem to be getting any joy from Haringey Council...

• Reference: 2001/0216-1
• Question by: Tony Arbour
• Meeting date: 10 October 2001

The public sessions of the LDA board concentrate mainly upon incidental discussions about strategies of the LDA and other GLA family members. With the LDA responsible for spending over a quarter of a billion pounds of public money why is it that the Board meets mainly in private? What do you have to hide? .

• Reference: 2001/0217-1
• Question by: Elizabeth Howlett
• Meeting date: 10 October 2001

What properties were handed over to the LDA at the time of the creation of the GLA and what has happened to them since then? .

• Reference: 2001/0218-1
• Question by: Andrew Pelling
• Meeting date: 10 October 2001

What do you see as the prospects for the East London Line actually being built and what impact do you see it having on economic development? .

• Reference: 2001/0219-1
• Question by: Elizabeth Howlett
• Meeting date: 10 October 2001

What assistance has been given to London's tourist industry which has been adversely impacted first by the foot and mouth crisis and now by the terrorist assault in America? .

• Reference: 2001/0220-1
• Question by: Andrew Pelling
• Meeting date: 10 October 2001

A publicly stated aim of the LDA is to further economic development. Please give your estimate of the increase in London's GDP due to the LDA.

• Reference: 2001/0221-1
• Question by: Andrew Pelling
• Meeting date: 10 October 2001

What plans do you have to improve inward investment into London? .