Search questions

• Question by: Len Duvall OBE
• Meeting date: 16 March 2023

Len Duvall OBE AM: On the Stadium, since you have both been in position, we have stabilised the costs around the Stadium. We understand more about what the Stadium can do or cannot do. You have conversations with all the tenants and particularly you have opened up a relationship with the anchor tenant, but there are still legal issues and they are about the contracts that you have between your good selves. What is the future of the Stadium? What does that look like over the coming years? What are the potential options around that? Could you just give us...

• Question by: Len Duvall OBE
• Meeting date: 16 March 2023

Len Duvall OBE AM: Let us go back to real estate around the Stadium. Most of that would have been part of the open space and parkland. There are no options and nothing under your plans that you would build on that open space element that is included in your development area.

• Question by: Len Duvall OBE
• Meeting date: 05 September 2019

Len Duvall OBE AM: Thank you very much. Can we go back to the Moore Stephens report? Can you just remind us of the steps that you have taken briefly since they highlighted that your organisation was taking most of the risks around the Stadium, both in capital and in terms of operating cost?

• Question by: Len Duvall OBE
• Meeting date: 06 September 2018

Len Duvall AM: Thank you very much. Can you turn to the stadium and the Moore Stephens report [ Olympic Stadium Review ]? Can you give us an update on how you have acted upon the findings of that report? When it was published [in November 2017] it talked particularly about the estimated projected losses. I think it quoted between £10 million and £20 million a year. Is that still the figure you are working to and is it still an objective to get that figure down? I do not mind who takes it.

• Reference: 2010/0180-1
• Question by: Len Duvall OBE
• Meeting date: 10 November 2010

What impact will the draconian grant reductions and impending abolition have on the ability of City Hall to oversee, initiate or promote the functions of the LDA and will any large scale regeneration project be possible following these changes?

• Reference: 2010/0182-1
• Question by: Len Duvall OBE
• Meeting date: 10 November 2010

Please outline in detail the current spending commitments of the LDA to programmes in Greenwich, including the proportion of funds that go to Greenwich through Londonwide LDA programmes.

• Reference: 2010/0183-1
• Question by: Len Duvall OBE
• Meeting date: 10 November 2010

What proportion (as an average percentage) of the current spending commitments of the LDA to programmes in Greenwich, including the proportion of funds that go to Greenwich through Londonwide LDA programmes do you expect to be retained in 2011/2012?

• Reference: 2010/0184-1
• Question by: Len Duvall OBE
• Meeting date: 10 November 2010

Please outline in detail the current spending commitments of the LDA to programmes in Lewisham, including the proportion of funds that go to Lewisham through Londonwide LDA programmes.

• Reference: 2010/0185
• Question by: Len Duvall OBE
• Meeting date: 10 November 2010

What proportion (as an average percentage) of the current spending commitments of the LDA to programmes in Lewisham, including the proportion of funds that go to Lewisham through Londonwide LDA programmes, do you expect to be retained in 2011/2012?

• Reference: 2010/0186-1
• Question by: Len Duvall OBE
• Meeting date: 10 November 2010

Please list 2010/2011 LDA funding programme-by-programme and forecasted 2011/2012 funding for the same programmes (presumably administered by the GLA)