Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • LDA Funding

    • Reference: 2010/0186-1
    • Question by: Len Duvall OBE
    • Meeting date: 10 November 2010
    Please list 2010/2011 LDA funding programme-by-programme and forecasted 2011/2012 funding for the same programmes (presumably administered by the GLA)
  • Exit liabilities

    • Reference: 2010/0198-1
    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 10 November 2010
    Can you summarise, as a list with current liabiliy for each of the next three years, all projects and other continuing liabilities for the agency?
  • Mayoral Directions

    • Reference: 2010/0199-1
    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 10 November 2010
    Can you list the projects funded by the LDA on a Mayoral direction and the amount budgeted, for each of he next three years?
  • Early Termination

    • Reference: 2010/0200-1
    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 10 November 2010
    Can you list projects you propose to close early or have given notice of early termination to, in the past year?
  • Climate change (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Tony Arbour
    • Meeting date: 10 November 2010
    I would like to return, please, to the question which was raised by John Biggs about the possible burden on London council taxpayers of the change of control. It is clear that there are going to be some continuing obligations which the LDA has entered into which are going to have to continue to be paid for. I want to know how you decide how the payments are going to be made? If those payments are going to be made, where is the money coming from? As I understand it, the vast bulk of the money which Government is going...
  • Climate change (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Richard Tracey
    • Meeting date: 10 November 2010
    The question has regularly been asked by those of us certainly from this side in the past about handing regeneration back to the boroughs. Where does this current situation leave us on that question, if I can follow the line that Tony was taking about on localism?
  • Climate change (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Len Duvall OBE
    • Meeting date: 10 November 2010
    Simon, you outlined earlier the worst case scenario is a Mayor coordination role in economic development activities across London. Is that correct as you would see it, if the worst case scenario is that the figures that have been indicated to us happen? Do you think it is more than that?Simon, you outlined earlier the worst case scenario is a Mayor coordination role in economic development activities across London. Is that correct as you would see it, if the worst case scenario is that the figures that have been indicated to us happen? Do you think it is more than...
  • Climate change (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 10 November 2010
    I am very grateful for your answers to Len Duvall and to other colleagues on the Assembly. The picture I have is still rather blurry. It is that you spent a lot of time speaking to the Treasury about how you might be funded, meanwhile this BIS, quietly got on with its job and scrapped all your funding. Is that essentially what happened?
  • Climate change (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Joanne McCartney
    • Meeting date: 10 November 2010
    I have two points I want to raise. One is on the back of what Andrew and other colleagues have raised and I agree with the confusion that there is out there with the LEPs. If I take my own area, the growth corridor of the Upper Lea Valley and Stansted, lots of work is being done on the LEP; lots of hours are being put into it to make the bid. They thought the Mayor was going to support it. Then, suddenly, the Mayor is putting the block on it completely; not letting it go through to be evaluated...
  • Climate change (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Andrew Boff
    • Meeting date: 10 November 2010
    Anthony Browne gave us evidence that he knew of 15 potential LEPs across London that were being proposed. Why would you turn them down if they have made a good local case?