Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

Meeting type

Organisation

Question by

Status

Year

  • Flood Management (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Samantha Heath
    • Meeting date: 17 March 2004
    Did Kate Barker pick it up effectively, as far as you are aware?

  • Flood Management (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Samantha Heath
    • Meeting date: 17 March 2004
    We need a comment on it.

  • Flood Management (Supplementary) [14]

    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 17 March 2004
    I am just astonished that so much planning can go on before you actually understand the size of the risk. There are aspects to the development which are clearly going to go ahead before you have the full report.

  • Flood Management (Supplementary) [15]

    • Question by: Samantha Heath
    • Meeting date: 17 March 2004
    We have worked with you extensively on our flooding report, and Darren Johnson actually signed up to that, so I was quite surprised at the Green Group's questioning. But the issues that we did identify that were of concern to the Committee were the commitment to the Green Grid, in terms of work you have done with the ODPM and we do recognise that the ODPM have actually recently announced more funding for the Green Grid. But I wanted to get a sense of how important they thought it was, and also to do with the Kate Barker report that...

  • Flood Management (Supplementary) [17]

    • Question by: Samantha Heath
    • Meeting date: 17 March 2004
    On the ODPM, how convinced are they of the case?

  • LDA Agenda (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Eric Ollerenshaw
    • Meeting date: 17 March 2004
    My question is on joined-up government and all these relationships with the ODPM, the DCMS, the DTI, GOL and all the rest of it. Did anybody inform you of the Government's new scheme to move some 80,000 jobs out of London? In a sense, there is a contradiction between the long-term plan that London is going to increase, and the Government actually trying to cut down the increase by moving jobs out of London. Was there any consultation with the LDA on this?

  • LDA Agenda (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 17 March 2004
    The thesis behind this question is that the Assembly has a statutory responsibility to hold the LDA to account, but you are not a creature of regional government; there are these multiple accountabilities. If we are to do our job in holding you to account effectively, we need to see how these conflicts are working, and we talked offline about the difficulty of, for example, making available publicly a Government Office for London quarterly assessment of you. I think we need to explore further how to see that relationship working better with government. Moving on to the second question relating...

  • LDA Agenda (Supplementary) [7]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 17 March 2004
    In relation to the mayoral interventions, either directly or through advisors, at the Economic and Social Development Committee you said that there had never been a time when you had actually refused a request. There had been vigorous discussions, but the answer had never been `no'.

  • LDA Agenda (Supplementary) [9]

    • Question by: Eric Ollerenshaw
    • Meeting date: 17 March 2004
    Yes

  • Leadership in the Thames Gateway (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Lynne Featherstone
    • Meeting date: 17 March 2004