Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 1

  • The Impact of the 5th London Safety Plan

    • Reference: 2014/4105
    • Question by: Andrew Boff
    • Meeting date: 05 November 2014
    The final version of the 5th London Safety Plan (LSP5) was approved by LFEPA on 12 September 2013. Since its implementation, what impact has this integrated risk management plan had on the Authority’s delivery of its three key strategic aims of Prevention, Protection and Response?
  • Savings

    • Reference: 2012/0212-1
    • Question by: Andrew Boff
    • Meeting date: 12 September 2012
    The London Fire Brigade faces the same spending constraints as other public service organisations. More than £50 million of savings from support services have already been achieved but further savings must be considered in the development of the 2012 -2015 London Safety Plan 5. What are you doing to ensure that the Plan benefits from the views of firefighters and their representatives?
  • Savings (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Gareth Bacon MP
    • Meeting date: 12 September 2012
    I completely understand the passion and intensity that Mr Shah wants to bring to the question around budget savings and where that may fall. However, I must draw your attention to the fact that the very first question was asked around engagement within the group by Andrew Boff. Mr Shah has a question; it is the fourth question on the order paper where he can bring all of this in, and he seems to be reordering the meeting without any permission from anybody. I just wonder if that is in order, Madam Chairman?
  • Privatisation (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Gareth Bacon MP
    • Meeting date: 12 September 2012
    I want to return to the question of Babcocks and the contract with them. Jenny Jones' original question asked whether or not it was wise to privatise core parts of the Fire Brigade, with the implication that there have been problems with various contracts and that might suggest that it is not. This can be answered either by the Commissioner or the Chairman. I have a few factual questions, so whoever has got the detail will be fine. Firstly, can you advise when the contract was actually signed with Babcocks?