Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • Proposal to Designate a Mayoral Development Area (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Stephen Knight
    • Meeting date: 17 December 2014
    Stephen Knight AM: Just one quick point and that is, is it legally possible to spend Section 106 or CIL money outside the boundary of a planning authority?
  • Proposal to Designate a Mayoral Development Area (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Murad Qureshi
    • Meeting date: 17 December 2014
    Murad Qureshi AM: Can I raise two or three issues. The first one, Eddie, I am grateful that you mentioned the canals at the outset. It is just unfortunate they do not show up on the maps. I have no doubts that residential developers will be eying those canal sides very eagerly, because I suspect they can enhance the values of the developments by up to 40%. That is the residential side. However, I am more concerned that they are used during the works construction on the site. I think this is going to be a huge development site, over...
  • Proposal to Designate a Mayoral Development Area (Supplementary) [9]

    • Question by: Jennette Arnold OBE
    • Meeting date: 17 December 2014
    Jenette Arnold OBE (Deputy Chair): I have a couple of questions, one for Sir Eddie, and one for Victoria Hills. Sir Eddie, in your introduction you mentioned that the Old Oak and Park Royal Development Corporation (OPDC) master plan was similar to the blueprint adopted by the LLDC. I know, as one of the three Assembly Members for the area covered by the LLDC, and was heavily involved in the consultation and now I keep a very strong watching brief on what is going on, that many aspects of the LLDC’s vision has changed. For instance, the LLDC plan started...
  • Proposal to Designate a Mayoral Development Area (Supplementary) [11]

    • Question by: Richard Tracey
    • Meeting date: 17 December 2014
    Richard Tracey AM: Thank you, Mr Chairman. Edward, can I first of all thank you for organising for the letter to Kit Malthouse [AM] about Wormwood Scrubs, which of course has been circulated to all of us. All of us on this side have received emails from many people who certainly were not constituents of ours but had some concerns, so I think it has helped very much to clarify, and I am grateful to Kit for writing to the Mayor about it. First of all though, I was going to say there is a lot of experience in this...
  • Financial Incentives

    • Reference: 2002/0218-1
    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    Will financial incentives really encourage Londoners to recycle more? .
  • 'Bring' Schemes for recyclables

    • Reference: 2002/0219-1
    • Question by: Lynne Featherstone
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    Is there any future in boroughs operating `bring" schemes for recyclables? .
  • Recycling Rates

    • Reference: 2002/0225-1
    • Question by: Lynne Featherstone
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    Why do you think that Sutton can achieve a 24% recycling rate for household waste when Haringey can only manage 8%? .
  • Government Target

    • Reference: 2002/0226-1
    • Question by: Lynne Featherstone
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    Will you hit the Government's target of 16% of London's waste being recycled or composted by 2003/4? .
  • Waste and Recycling Challenges

    • Reference: 2002/0230-1
    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    What work is being done at a regional level to address the particular challenges faced by densely populated inner city communities in relation to waste and recycling? .