Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • Proposal to Designate a Mayoral Development Area (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Stephen Knight
    • Meeting date: 17 December 2014
    Stephen Knight AM: Just one quick point and that is, is it legally possible to spend Section 106 or CIL money outside the boundary of a planning authority?
  • Proposal to Designate a Mayoral Development Area (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Murad Qureshi
    • Meeting date: 17 December 2014
    Murad Qureshi AM: Can I raise two or three issues. The first one, Eddie, I am grateful that you mentioned the canals at the outset. It is just unfortunate they do not show up on the maps. I have no doubts that residential developers will be eying those canal sides very eagerly, because I suspect they can enhance the values of the developments by up to 40%. That is the residential side. However, I am more concerned that they are used during the works construction on the site. I think this is going to be a huge development site, over...
  • Proposal to Designate a Mayoral Development Area (Supplementary) [9]

    • Question by: Jennette Arnold OBE
    • Meeting date: 17 December 2014
    Jenette Arnold OBE (Deputy Chair): I have a couple of questions, one for Sir Eddie, and one for Victoria Hills. Sir Eddie, in your introduction you mentioned that the Old Oak and Park Royal Development Corporation (OPDC) master plan was similar to the blueprint adopted by the LLDC. I know, as one of the three Assembly Members for the area covered by the LLDC, and was heavily involved in the consultation and now I keep a very strong watching brief on what is going on, that many aspects of the LLDC’s vision has changed. For instance, the LLDC plan started...
  • Proposal to Designate a Mayoral Development Area (Supplementary) [11]

    • Question by: Richard Tracey
    • Meeting date: 17 December 2014
    Richard Tracey AM: Thank you, Mr Chairman. Edward, can I first of all thank you for organising for the letter to Kit Malthouse [AM] about Wormwood Scrubs, which of course has been circulated to all of us. All of us on this side have received emails from many people who certainly were not constituents of ours but had some concerns, so I think it has helped very much to clarify, and I am grateful to Kit for writing to the Mayor about it. First of all though, I was going to say there is a lot of experience in this...
  • Waste Minimisation and Recycling Fund

    • Reference: 2002/0200-1
    • Question by: Samantha Heath
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    Of the £21 million government Waste Minimisation and Recycling Fund what money has been allocated so far and to whom? .
  • Publicity and Promotion

    • Reference: 2002/0201-1
    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    Given that a London-wide education and promotion programme is due by 31st March 2003, can you let us know the nature of that campaign? .
  • Reprocessing

    • Reference: 2002/0202-1
    • Question by: Meg Hillier
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    What support is planned for London Remade after the current Single Regeneration Budget (SRB) funding ends? .
  • Civic Amenity/Waste Transfer Sites

    • Reference: 2002/0203-1
    • Question by: Len Duvall OBE
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    What measures do you believe are appropriate to alleviate noise, traffic congestion and pollution to local residents living close to civic amenity sites? .
  • Green Procurement

    • Reference: 2002/0204-1
    • Question by: Valerie Shawcross
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    Which Government Offices and Local Authorities have yet to sign up to the Green Procurement code? .
  • Capital Standards Campaign

    • Reference: 2002/0221-1
    • Question by: Graham Tope
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    In March of this year the Mayor told the Assembly that his Capital Standards Campaign would help in combating environmental crime. Are there any early results of how the campaign has gone? .