Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 1

  • Single Waste Disposal Authority (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    So the transport costs will be more expensive. What about the administration costs?
  • Single Waste Disposal Authority (Supplementary) [7]

    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    What concerns have the boroughs expressed?
  • Single Waste Disposal Authority (Supplementary) [8]

    • Question by: Samantha Heath
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    On the London-wide issue, you do say in the implementation plan on the waste strategy, that you propose to develop a modern network of civic amenity sites with a focus on recycling and re-use. I notice that only one borough was successful in transforming its civic amenity site in the implementation money of £21 million. Are you actually now going out there and evangelising on supporting a better network of civic amenity sites and in addition, my big concern is that some borough are actually restricting access to their civic amenity sites, and that really isn't a particularly strategic London-wide...
  • Single Waste Disposal Authority (Supplementary) [9]

    • Question by: Samantha Heath
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    Are you then going to tell boroughs - we're not talking about prescribing, but are you actually going to then try and do something to prevent boroughs from restricting access to civic amenity sites. At the moment some boroughs charge and restrict access.
  • Single Waste Disposal Authority (Supplementary) [10]

    • Question by: Samantha Heath
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    The reason I came at this with this question is because we're miles away from getting a single waste disposal authority for London, and if we can't even get our civic amenity sites working together, what hope is there?
  • Single Waste Disposal Authority (Supplementary) [11]

    • Question by: Brian Coleman
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    I think Mr Duffy is slightly incorrect. In Barnet, I don't care how many residents come from other boroughs and use my civic amenity sites, because it ups our recycling credit. And the Mayor is welcome from Cricklewood or anybody else is welcome to our wonderful civic amenity site, which we operate in partnership with ECT at Summers Lane in N12, and which replaced Tilling Way well over 12 months ago now. It's even better than Sutton and we would welcome anybody from north London or anybody else to bring their rubbish, because we need recycling credits in Barnet. I...
  • Single Waste Disposal Authority (Supplementary) [12]

    • Question by: Samantha Heath
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    Sorry, I'm confused. I thought your bid was for education.
  • Implementation and Partnerships (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Meg Hillier
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    Right, okay, I'm aware of that. How much are you talking to the LDA about future funding, because 2004 is around the corner. SRB runs out. The LDA have made some sort of vague planning and support for it. Are you looking the LDA in the eye and helping to discuss this issue with them?
  • Implementation and Partnerships (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Sally Hamwee
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    I entirely understand what you're saying about partnership requiring some give and take. It doesn't always make for the happiest committee, but can I understand - are there published criteria that the boroughs can look to, to understand whether in the next round of bidding they are likely to be successful?
  • Implementation and Partnerships (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Sally Hamwee
    • Meeting date: 13 November 2002
    So, when you're assessing the bids, you're working to those criteria of the committee?