Search questions

• Reference: 2015/3751
• Question by: Steve O'Connell
• Meeting date: 18 November 2015

What changes do you anticipate to the London Plan or other planning guidance as a result of your new action plan to help tackle flooding risks in London?

• Reference: 2015/3301
• Question by: Steve O'Connell
• Meeting date: 21 October 2015

How will you be taking forward the Government's recent announcement to enable the delivery of Starter Homes in London?

• Reference: 2015/0402
• Question by: Steve O'Connell
• Meeting date: 21 January 2015

In December you visited The Institute of Cancer Research in Belmont, where you made clear that you strongly supported the plans to expand to become the second biggest campus of its kind in the world. What effect will these plans have on the business case for the Sutton Tram Extension?

• Reference: 2002/0218-1
• Question by: Mike Tuffrey
• Meeting date: 13 November 2002

Will financial incentives really encourage Londoners to recycle more? .

• Reference: 2002/0219-1
• Question by: Lynne Featherstone
• Meeting date: 13 November 2002

Is there any future in boroughs operating `bring" schemes for recyclables? .

• Reference: 2002/0225-1
• Question by: Lynne Featherstone
• Meeting date: 13 November 2002

Why do you think that Sutton can achieve a 24% recycling rate for household waste when Haringey can only manage 8%? .

• Reference: 2002/0226-1
• Question by: Lynne Featherstone
• Meeting date: 13 November 2002

Will you hit the Government's target of 16% of London's waste being recycled or composted by 2003/4? .

• Reference: 2002/0230-1
• Question by: Mike Tuffrey
• Meeting date: 13 November 2002

What work is being done at a regional level to address the particular challenges faced by densely populated inner city communities in relation to waste and recycling? .

• Question by: Tony Arbour
• Meeting date: 10 October 2001

• Question by: Lynne Featherstone
• Meeting date: 10 October 2001

Thank you. I think you have just demonstrated the point, actually. You've given a reasonably full answer on tourism, which is something we should have had before. If it wasn't Functional Bodies Question Time today, would we have had that information? The point about this whole debate, and I think you're getting it cross-party actually, is the feeling that you stick out like a sore thumb in your attitude towards openness and accountability, not just to the public. I would like these meetings all to be public and I would like all the information. What you've said today should have...