Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • Budget (Supplementary) [7]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    But you cannot give a guarantee?
  • Budget (Supplementary) [12]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    Okay, so the environment is a major feature, but we may have to see some scaling down on the bid commitments because of cost overruns?
  • Budget (Supplementary) [16]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    On the budget issue, we saw environmental and legacy commitments being scaled back in Athens as a result of going over budget. Can you give an absolute guarantee that there will be no scaling back in London from what was promised in the bid documents?
  • Renewable Energy

    • Reference: 2006/0104-1
    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 14 June 2006
    Existing planning permission for the Stratford City development specifies that a minimum of 2% of energy requirements of the development be provided from locally resourced renewable energy. This is a long way short of the commitment in Towards a One Planet Olympics for an 'Athletes' Village capable of being energy self-sufficient'. As part of the Athletes' Village will now be sited within the Stratford City development, will the ODA seek new planning permission, specifying the Athletes' Village as a Zero-Energy Development? If not, how will the ODA ensure that the Athletes' Village is "energy self -sufficient"?
  • Living wage (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    That is very welcome. Will you actually write that into the contracts, and has it already been written into those contracts that have already been let?
  • Living wage (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    Again, will there be independent monitoring, as I mentioned earlier with the sustainability issues, of contracts, compliance, and such like to ensure that it does happen, and it is actually delivered?
  • Damage to business from marketing restrictions (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    That sounds reassuring, because obviously, we want to prevent profiteering, and we want to prevent these big companies moving in and just profiteering without actually putting anything into the event or into the long term. However, in terms of the way the legislation that Peter (Hulme Cross) has shown me is being drafted, it does seem to imply that certain words would be banned in certain combinations. I am all for making sure that Nike or whoever cannot profiteer from this event, but if the local café wants to run an Olympics event night or something like that, I do...
  • Alternative sites for Travellers

    • Reference: 2005/0276-1
    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    What alternative sites are being provided for the Traveller families displaced by the Olympics?
  • Waterways

    • Reference: 2005/0278-1
    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    Given the massive potential for waterborne freight in the Lower Lea Valley, will the Olympic construction contracts require that construction companies make full use of the waterways surrounding the Olympics site to transport materials and waste?
  • Waterways

    • Reference: 2005/0279-1
    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    What will be done to ensure that the potential for waterborne fright in the Lower Lea Valley is maximised during the legacy phase of the Olympics?