Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

  • Step Change and Public Expectations

    • Reference: 2003/0427
    • Question by: Richard Barnes
    • Meeting date: 10 December 2003
    Given the overwhelming public demand for more community based police patrolling on foot, will the step-change programme prove sufficient to meet public expectations? .
  • Cost of Capital City and Security Functions

    • Reference: 2003/0434
    • Question by: Tony Arbour
    • Meeting date: 10 December 2003
    Has research been undertaken within the MPS to examine if the funding from the Home Office for capital city and security functions fully meets the true cost of providing these services, and if so, what were its conclusions? .
  • Transport

    • Reference: 2003/0307
    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 15 October 2003
    What specific ideas do you have in your plans for the Olympics that will reduce the environmental impact of transport in East London both during and after the games? .
  • Finance and Co-odination

    • Reference: 2003/0310
    • Question by: Tony Arbour
    • Meeting date: 15 October 2003
    Why is it that only Londoners will be forced to pay an extra £20 a year for 12 years on their Council Tax, when other parts of the country will also be hosting Olympic events? Do you feel that this is a good deal for Londoners? .
  • Finance and Co-odination

    • Reference: 2003/0311
    • Question by: Toby Harris
    • Meeting date: 15 October 2003
    With rising land values in London, what contingency funding is available to support increasing costs associated with identified, prioritized and necessary infrastructure projects, such as station improvements, that will enhance the Olympic bid? .
  • Private Infracos

    • Reference: 2003/0251
    • Question by: Noel Lynch
    • Meeting date: 11 June 2003
    What residual powers will be retained by LUL / TfL when the Underground stations are transferred by lease to the private infracos? In particular, will the private infracos be completely free (subject to planning controls) to develop station space above or around station sites commercially for maximum profit? .
  • Tube and PPP contracts

    • Reference: 2003/0145
    • Question by: Lynne Featherstone
    • Meeting date: 11 June 2003
    The closure of the extremely busy Central Line for the best part of three months, though highly inconvenient, showed that London does not have to come to a halt if a key line is closed down. Do you now believe that TfL could get very much better value for money out of the PPP contracts if work to upgrade the Tube system (track, signalling, stations) were concentrated into periods where lines or sections of line were closed entirely, rather than being restricted to 12.30am 5.30am with all the inefficiencies of stop-start-stop that this entails? .
  • Accountability

    • Reference: 2003/0149
    • Question by: Sally Hamwee
    • Meeting date: 11 June 2003
    Do you report directly to Bob Kiley? .
  • Applying experience to London Tube

    • Reference: 2003/0150
    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 11 June 2003
    Mr O'Toole your strengths are obviously in contract management looking at your previous business experience. How can what you have learned from your previous experience be best applied to London's Tube network? .
  • Customer checks on the Tube

    • Reference: 2003/0151
    • Question by: Lynne Featherstone
    • Meeting date: 11 June 2003
    Do you agree that there should be 5 key, and customer `friendly', indicators that Londoners can use to judge the success that Transport for London may, or may not make in operating the Tube? .