Search questions

• Reference: 2004/0053-1
• Question by: Toby Harris
• Meeting date: 14 January 2004

What consideration has TfL given to promoting a citywide partnership to improve road safety across London? .

• Reference: 2004/0054-1
• Question by: Toby Harris
• Meeting date: 14 January 2004

What progress has been made on proposal 4G.22 contained the Mayor's Transport Strategy, which commits to working with TfL to establish and investment programme to implement new signing initiatives .

• Reference: 2004/0055-1
• Question by: Toby Harris
• Meeting date: 14 January 2004

What work is being undertaken to establish the impact that bad street nameplate maintenance has on people with visual impairments? Are there any plans to sample the quality of street nameplate across London? .

• Reference: 2004/0056-1
• Question by: Toby Harris
• Meeting date: 14 January 2004

What is being done to assess the impact that bad street nameplate design, positioning and maintenance has on emergency vehicles responding to emergency calls? .

• Reference: 2004/0057-1
• Question by: Meg Hillier
• Meeting date: 14 January 2004

TfL is introducing a new straight across pedestrian crossing at the junction of Junction Road and the Archway gyratory. What other plans does TfL have for improving the area around Archway now that the developer who was offering funding is no longer involved. What funding is needed and what is the timescale for improvements? .

• Reference: 2004/0058-1
• Question by: Valerie Shawcross
• Meeting date: 14 January 2004

In April 2003 there was an exchange of correspondence between TfL and Clapham South Neighbourhood Assn. Since that time the residents have not been briefed on the progress of the highway aspects of the scheme being discussed between TfL and Tesco's consultants. As you may be aware the whole development is the subject of considerable and long standing conflict between the community and Tescos. However, at this stage the residents are concerned with the traffic impact of the scheme which is going ahead, and that the design of the access to the store and adjacent junctions should function with maximum...

• Reference: 2004/0059-1
• Question by: Meg Hillier
• Meeting date: 14 January 2004

Tim O'Toole (letter dated 24 October 2003) informed me that once the overview by an independent engineering firm has been completed at the end of 2003 we would know if Metronet has met its targets. Has it met its targets? If they have not what methods will you impose so that they improve this service and meet these targets? .

• Reference: 2004/0060-1
• Question by: Meg Hillier
• Meeting date: 14 January 2004

What plans do you have for the improvement of the No 4 bus service? As confirmed by a petition many constituents report this route as a real problem. Can you look into short-term measures to improve this service rather than just wait for the re-tendering process for 2005-06.

• Reference: 2004/0061-1
• Question by: Meg Hillier
• Meeting date: 14 January 2004

Although the 158-bus service has improved it is still not meeting its targets and in reality makes constituents life a nightmare as it is so unreliable. What extra measures will you introduce to ensure it will meet its targets.

• Reference: 2004/0062-1
• Question by: Meg Hillier
• Meeting date: 14 January 2004

Bus bunching is one of the most common complaints about buses. What are you doing to tackle this? .