Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 1

  • Local Community Interests (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    A lot of people will look to their local councillors as being people to protect their interests. How do you see that working? I know the local five boroughs have, more or less, agreed a single position on the Olympics and how they work with it. Do you have any problems with any of their requests and proposals?
  • Local Community Interests (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    I have a feeling that if Angie (Bray) were Mayor of London, she might have problems with it, as well. Leaving that flippant comment to one side, do you see, for example, London Citizens having a continuing involvement with the Olympics?
  • Local Community Interests (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    It would be very helpful for everyone if those relationships were understood, so that if the DCMS Select Committee makes a point, and the Assembly contradicts it and has a different perspective, there is a coherent response to that, and we understand how the hierarchy works, and how the different interests are being responded to and protected and so on. This could become a rather bureaucratic conversation, but some serious work needs to take place outside of meetings like this. Otherwise, we are going to have lots of very interesting headlines, but maybe not a lot of light shed on...
  • Local Community Interests (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    Some months ago, in Mary's (Reilly) absence, I had the privilege, as vice chair of the LDA, to be a co-signatory with you of a letter to London Citizens. They are a particular pressure group on behalf of a number of faith groups, in particular. A number of comments were made to them about housing, about training, and so on. How do you see that being followed through in the coming months and years?
  • Local Community Interests (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    Thank you for that. Clearly, it is a bit like the situation with local businesses, that although there may be a range of formal commitments which are very well detailed and set down, individual people and interest groups might have difficulty understanding how they get into the structure of the Olympics. Say your road is stopped up, because there is some work taking place, or some development happens at the end of your street for the Olympics, and you do not really understand who to go to, or why it is happening. How is that mechanism going to work?
  • Local Community Interests (Supplementary) [8]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    One final question, and I can ask this by posing a possible answer, I suppose: who should hold the Olympics to account? Potentially, the Olympics board holds it to account; the ODA holds it to account; the LDA holds it to account; and the London Assembly and each of the individual boroughs might consider they have to. There is a Select Committee of the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) which might want to, as well. Is there potentially a real messy soup of accountability, out of which everyone will want a soundbite, but no one will actually wrestle...
  • Compulsory Purchase (Supplementary) [14]

    • Question by: Damian Hockney
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    Then, of course, the thing you do not say during that ' the thing you do not say ' is that a large amount of that money has been wasted by yourselves, because these people started and got to heads of agreement terms last year on deals, which then incurred large amounts of lawyers', managers', project managers', and accountants' fees, and then you were the ones who stalled on it. I have a detail here of almost £200,000 worth of work done, which you have wasted. What is the most absurd thing ' and the fact that you are saying...
  • Compulsory Purchase (Supplementary) [17]

    • Question by: Damian Hockney
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    How much has the LDA paid on lawyers? How much has the LDA paid on lawyers?
  • Compulsory Purchase (Supplementary) [18]

    • Question by: Damian Hockney
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    They were lobbying to get their businesses. They were lobbying.
  • Compulsory Purchase (Supplementary) [25]

    • Question by: Damian Hockney
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    Mayor, how can you honestly suggest that these people would lobby against the Games? They were lobbying for their interests. Many of them stand to go bust. Many of them stand to genuinely lose their business. I am a businessman. Sally Hamwee (Chair): I said a short question. Damian Hockney (AM): I know if I were offered that compensation, I would be dead.