Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 1

  • Local Community Interests (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    A lot of people will look to their local councillors as being people to protect their interests. How do you see that working? I know the local five boroughs have, more or less, agreed a single position on the Olympics and how they work with it. Do you have any problems with any of their requests and proposals?
  • Local Community Interests (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    I have a feeling that if Angie (Bray) were Mayor of London, she might have problems with it, as well. Leaving that flippant comment to one side, do you see, for example, London Citizens having a continuing involvement with the Olympics?
  • Local Community Interests (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    It would be very helpful for everyone if those relationships were understood, so that if the DCMS Select Committee makes a point, and the Assembly contradicts it and has a different perspective, there is a coherent response to that, and we understand how the hierarchy works, and how the different interests are being responded to and protected and so on. This could become a rather bureaucratic conversation, but some serious work needs to take place outside of meetings like this. Otherwise, we are going to have lots of very interesting headlines, but maybe not a lot of light shed on...
  • Local Community Interests (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    Some months ago, in Mary's (Reilly) absence, I had the privilege, as vice chair of the LDA, to be a co-signatory with you of a letter to London Citizens. They are a particular pressure group on behalf of a number of faith groups, in particular. A number of comments were made to them about housing, about training, and so on. How do you see that being followed through in the coming months and years?
  • Local Community Interests (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    Thank you for that. Clearly, it is a bit like the situation with local businesses, that although there may be a range of formal commitments which are very well detailed and set down, individual people and interest groups might have difficulty understanding how they get into the structure of the Olympics. Say your road is stopped up, because there is some work taking place, or some development happens at the end of your street for the Olympics, and you do not really understand who to go to, or why it is happening. How is that mechanism going to work?
  • Local Community Interests (Supplementary) [8]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    One final question, and I can ask this by posing a possible answer, I suppose: who should hold the Olympics to account? Potentially, the Olympics board holds it to account; the ODA holds it to account; the LDA holds it to account; and the London Assembly and each of the individual boroughs might consider they have to. There is a Select Committee of the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) which might want to, as well. Is there potentially a real messy soup of accountability, out of which everyone will want a soundbite, but no one will actually wrestle...
  • Disabled access (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Geoff Pope
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    Thank you. Clearly, work is being done, but I read in the Paralympic Games bid document that the catchment area for the Paralympics is 30 million people across much of southern England within a day trip of the Games. Therefore, what is going to be done about helping people with any kind of disability across that catchment area, particularly if they rely on mainline rail services? What plans are in place for that situation?
  • Disabled access (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Geoff Pope
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    Will you set them objectives or targets?
  • Disabled access (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Geoff Pope
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    Thank you. On getting into London itself and the fact that it is going to be a very broad-based Games, we know that we have real problems in access for people with disabilities to our public buildings. Indeed, a recent statement in Disability Capital states that only 17% of public buildings in London are accessible. What plans are in place for involving disabled people in the cultural Olympiad?
  • Disabled access (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Geoff Pope
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    Turning to the bus service, which you state will be fully compliant by 2006; I think you said early 2006 but are the ramps actually working? In fact, my evidence is that in many cases it is not possible for people with a wheelchair to access a bus on a low floor through a ramp, because the ramp is inoperable. Are there any efforts by TfL to get on top of this, such as using a secret-shopper approach?