Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 1

Meeting type

Organisation

Question by 2

Status

Year

  • Transport for the Games (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    How will the OTA be made up? Who will appoint the members?

  • Transport for the Games (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    What you are saying, though ' and I can understand the imperatives ' is basically that the transport needs of the Olympics, those couple of weeks, are going to be paramount over the transport needs of Londoners, as interpreted by TfL. How will a dispute of that sort be resolved?

  • Transport for the Games (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    Then there will not be another road grab beyond the one that is currently in progress?

  • Transport for the Games (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    What if the OTA has a dispute with the boroughs and the roads that they operate? Who resolves that problem, then?

  • Transport for the Games (Supplementary) [7]

    • Question by: Roger Evans
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    Just so we can understand what are the implications of that, you talk about developing an Olympic road network. Is that just going to be roads which are currently part of the TfL strategic road network, or do you see that network including a lot more borough roads and being a lot wider?

  • Alternative sites for Travellers

    • Reference: 2005/0276-1
    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    What alternative sites are being provided for the Traveller families displaced by the Olympics?

  • Waterways

    • Reference: 2005/0278-1
    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    Given the massive potential for waterborne freight in the Lower Lea Valley, will the Olympic construction contracts require that construction companies make full use of the waterways surrounding the Olympics site to transport materials and waste?

  • Waterways

    • Reference: 2005/0279-1
    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    What will be done to ensure that the potential for waterborne fright in the Lower Lea Valley is maximised during the legacy phase of the Olympics?

  • Waterways

    • Reference: 2005/0280-1
    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    As a new lock at the junction of Prescott Channel and Abbey Creek could significantly increase the potential of the River Lea to carry freight, why does planning report PDU/0909a,b,c,d/02 stipulate that no new impounding structures be permitted?

  • Waterways

    • Reference: 2005/0281-1
    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 08 September 2005
    Are there any plans to recommission Cody Dock for use by waterborne freight carriers?