Search questions

• Reference: 2004/0053-1
• Question by: Toby Harris
• Meeting date: 14 January 2004

What consideration has TfL given to promoting a citywide partnership to improve road safety across London? .

• Reference: 2004/0054-1
• Question by: Toby Harris
• Meeting date: 14 January 2004

What progress has been made on proposal 4G.22 contained the Mayor's Transport Strategy, which commits to working with TfL to establish and investment programme to implement new signing initiatives .

• Reference: 2004/0055-1
• Question by: Toby Harris
• Meeting date: 14 January 2004

What work is being undertaken to establish the impact that bad street nameplate maintenance has on people with visual impairments? Are there any plans to sample the quality of street nameplate across London? .

• Reference: 2004/0056-1
• Question by: Toby Harris
• Meeting date: 14 January 2004

What is being done to assess the impact that bad street nameplate design, positioning and maintenance has on emergency vehicles responding to emergency calls? .

• Reference: 2004/0086-1
• Question by: Noel Lynch
• Meeting date: 14 January 2004

What green belt sites are being considered for development associated with Crossrail, such as depots? Has TfL been involved in discussions about such sites? Will you guarantee that: 1. Crossrail will not threaten the Maylands Fields part of the Ingrebourne Valley Site of Metropolitan Importance for Nature Conservation (SMINC); and 2. no green belt land in the Harold Wood area will be threatened by Crossrail? .

• Reference: 2004/0087-1
• Question by: Noel Lynch
• Meeting date: 14 January 2004

Can you confirm reports that TfL is unenthusiastic about the proposed Richmond corridor component of Crossrail? Do you agree that alternative West London routes (e.g. a stopping service from Paddington to Slough - connecting West Drayton, Southall and Hanwell, and a route from Paddington via Acton and Park Royal to Uxbridge) would do far more to assist regeneration and reduce car use? .

• Reference: 2004/0088-1
• Question by: Noel Lynch
• Meeting date: 14 January 2004

Has London Underground carried out a recent comprehensive survey of the provision and quality of public toilets at tube stations? If not, will you agree to conduct such a survey and publish the results? .

• Reference: 2004/0089-1
• Question by: Noel Lynch
• Meeting date: 14 January 2004

Has TfL carried out a recent comprehensive survey of the provision and quality of public toilets at transport interchanges, including bus-only interchanges? If not, will you agree to conduct such a survey and publish the results? .

• Reference: 2003/0311
• Question by: Toby Harris
• Meeting date: 15 October 2003

With rising land values in London, what contingency funding is available to support increasing costs associated with identified, prioritized and necessary infrastructure projects, such as station improvements, that will enhance the Olympic bid? .

• Question by: Toby Harris
• Meeting date: 15 October 2003

Thank you for that. Clearly, there is a great deal of private sector support for the Olympic bid. I know the London Business Board is very much behind what is happening. Can you tell us what discussions there have been with the private sector about either PPP arrangements for contributing or helping with the Olympics in general, and, more specifically, in terms of private sector involvement in funding improvements for the general street environment in time for 2012?