Search questions

• Question by: Stephen Knight
• Meeting date: 17 December 2014

Stephen Knight AM: Just one quick point and that is, is it legally possible to spend Section 106 or CIL money outside the boundary of a planning authority?

• Question by: Murad Qureshi
• Meeting date: 17 December 2014

Murad Qureshi AM: Can I raise two or three issues. The first one, Eddie, I am grateful that you mentioned the canals at the outset. It is just unfortunate they do not show up on the maps. I have no doubts that residential developers will be eying those canal sides very eagerly, because I suspect they can enhance the values of the developments by up to 40%. That is the residential side. However, I am more concerned that they are used during the works construction on the site. I think this is going to be a huge development site, over...

• Question by: Jennette Arnold OBE
• Meeting date: 17 December 2014

Jenette Arnold OBE (Deputy Chair): I have a couple of questions, one for Sir Eddie, and one for Victoria Hills. Sir Eddie, in your introduction you mentioned that the Old Oak and Park Royal Development Corporation (OPDC) master plan was similar to the blueprint adopted by the LLDC. I know, as one of the three Assembly Members for the area covered by the LLDC, and was heavily involved in the consultation and now I keep a very strong watching brief on what is going on, that many aspects of the LLDC’s vision has changed. For instance, the LLDC plan started...

• Question by: Richard Tracey
• Meeting date: 17 December 2014

Richard Tracey AM: Thank you, Mr Chairman. Edward, can I first of all thank you for organising for the letter to Kit Malthouse [AM] about Wormwood Scrubs, which of course has been circulated to all of us. All of us on this side have received emails from many people who certainly were not constituents of ours but had some concerns, so I think it has helped very much to clarify, and I am grateful to Kit for writing to the Mayor about it. First of all though, I was going to say there is a lot of experience in this...

• Reference: 2011/0211-1
• Question by: Joanne McCartney
• Meeting date: 07 December 2011

How are you working with TfL to deal with the worrying increases over the past year of robbery and violence on the local bus network?

• Reference: 2011/0212-1
• Question by: Joanne McCartney
• Meeting date: 07 December 2011

How are you working with TfL to deal with the worrying increases over the past year of robbery and theft on the local bus network?

• Reference: 2011/0213-1
• Question by: Joanne McCartney
• Meeting date: 07 December 2011

What representations have the MPS made to government for funding the Diamond Jubilee celebrations next year, given that the MPS estimate the bill could reach nearly £15m?

• Reference: 2011/0214-1
• Question by: Joanne McCartney
• Meeting date: 07 December 2011

The MPS latest budget forecasts note that 5,397 of planned officer numbers for the next financial year are expected to be paid for by third parties and specific grants. How many of these posts actually have guaranteed funding in place and for what time scale?

• Reference: 2011/0215-1
• Question by: Joanne McCartney
• Meeting date: 07 December 2011

The MPS latest budget forecasts note that 949 of planned PCSO numbers for the next financial year are expected to be paid for by third parties and specific grants. How many of these posts actually have guaranteed funding in place and for what time scale?

• Reference: 2011/0216-1
• Question by: Joanne McCartney
• Meeting date: 07 December 2011

The MPS is seeking 'flexibility for Olympic budgets in 2012' from the Home Office( Policing London Business Plan report to MPA November 2011). Specifically what flexibility is the MPS seeking and what risks will this mitigate?