Search questions

• Question by: Jenny Jones
• Meeting date: 08 March 2012

Jenny Jones (AM): I would like to go back to Tony's questioning, which I completely support. I think senior police officers are paid amply and could probably provide their own legal services. Perhaps we should go through all the evidence from the Leveson and work out what percentage of their answers are completely of non-public concern or where we are not liable to pay for them and we could claim our fees back. What do you think, Tony? Would you like to write to the Commissioner and suggest that? Anyway, getting back to the papers Tony Arbour (AM): I am...

• Reference: 2001/0079-1
• Question by: Victor Anderson
• Meeting date: 11 July 2001

What role will he play in the drawing up and implementation of the Energy Strategy? .

• Reference: 2001/0077-1
• Question by: Victor Anderson
• Meeting date: 11 July 2001

What role will he play in the drawing up of the Spatial Development Strategy? .

• Reference: 2001/0078-1
• Question by: Jenny Jones
• Meeting date: 11 July 2001

What possibilities is he considering for pedestrianisation schemes? . (Victor Anderson) In the advice that you give, will you be giving advice about pedestrianisation schemes, because you have spoken in favour of them in the past and they are also referred to in general terms in the document. But there is only one specific scheme that is proposed in the document which is the one at Trafalgar Square. Will you be pressing for others? .

• Question by: Victor Anderson
• Meeting date: 11 July 2001

What advice will you give to the Mayor about the two different views in the proposals document about development of London? One of the views in the document is the emphasis on orbital public transport routes creating a city of interchanges. The other view is that there are four development corridors which link the City of London and central London to existing airports or a possible future airport in North Thames. With these two contrasting views in the same document, what view will you take?

• Question by: Victor Anderson
• Meeting date: 11 July 2001

Do you think that the SDS will be able to deliver a better quality design that you have talked about? Because I think that there is a danger that we will have a rhetoric about better quality design but not actually mechanisms for achieving it.