Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

Meeting type

Organisation

Question by

Status

Year

  • Question and Answer Session: Functional Bodies - London Legacy Development Corporation (LLDC)

    • Reference: 2021/4339
    • Question by: Andrew Boff
    • Meeting date: 11 November 2021
    How are the Mayoral Development Corporations delivering for Londoners?

  • Question and Answer Session: Functional Bodies - Old Oak and Park Royal Development Corporation (OPDC)

    • Reference: 2021/4340
    • Question by: Andrew Boff
    • Meeting date: 11 November 2021
    How are the Mayoral Development Corporations delivering for Londoners?

  • Governance and Leadership at the OPDC

    • Reference: 2019/12660
    • Question by: Navin Shah
    • Meeting date: 04 July 2019
    [to the Interim Chief Executive] What will be the main priorities of the incoming Chief Executive?

  • Housing Infrastructure Fund

    • Reference: 2019/12661
    • Question by: Siân Berry
    • Meeting date: 04 July 2019
    How has the Housing Infrastructure Fund process helped progress the OPDC plans?

  • Maximising the Opportunities of the OPDC

    • Reference: 2019/12662
    • Question by: Tony Devenish
    • Meeting date: 04 July 2019
    How can the Mayor and the Government help you “sell” OPDC to sovereign wealth funds with the necessary long-term perspective to unlock billions of pounds and therefore tens of thousands of homes and jobs by the mid- 2020s?

  • Community Fire Safety Work (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 08 November 2006
    Am I right in saying that the target for the percentage of time spent on community fire safety at station level has risen from 6 per cent to 8 per cent? Looking at the actual performance last year, over a third of our stations exceeded 10 per cent and one of them, Sutton, according to the figures, spent 25 per cent of their time on community fire safety. Is not 8 per cent really too low as a target, therefore, and should we not be getting the average a lot higher?

  • Community Fire Safety Work (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 08 November 2006
    If some can achieve above 20 per cent, can we not encourage the others too?

  • Community Fire Safety Work (Supplementary) [8]

    • Question by: Angie Bray
    • Meeting date: 08 November 2006
    Thank you, Sir Ken. I think we would all like to congratulate those success stories that you have just highlighted. Obviously the picture we are getting is that it is a patchy performance across London. Would you agree with that?

  • Defibrillators (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Elizabeth Howlett
    • Meeting date: 08 November 2006
    Thank you very much, Commissioner. I am very delighted to hear that, although I was rather sorry that there was a delay because I can remember at least two years ago when we were in here for a scrutiny session, and you came with your Union Representative and he agreed that there really was no hold up with the Union as to getting this sorted out in London as long as they were not to be sent there instead of an ambulance, to which we, of course, agreed. You have been given £100,000, but none of this has been drawn...

  • Shift Patterns (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 08 November 2006
    Just in case Londoners watching this think that London Fire Service is always locked in disputes about things, I think other answers and briefings we have seen show that there has been massive development of work practices and cooperation, for example, community fire safety work, which I think all Londoners would welcome. This does look like an impending dispute and I am wondering how you see it evolving and being managed and, without carrying your negotiations on in public, what you see as being the bottom line, the problems, the challenges that we face in addressing those?