Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 3

  • Vision for Old Oak Common (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Len Duvall OBE
    • Meeting date: 07 September 2017
    Len Duvall AM: Can we go back to the Crossrail depot? Do you both agree with Sir Terry Farrell’s [British architect] comments when he says the failure to plan to deck over the Crossrail depot represents London’s worst cock-up in 50 years?
  • Vision for Old Oak Common (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Navin Shah
    • Meeting date: 07 September 2017
    Navin Shah AM: Thank you, Chair. May I raise an issue about locality versus density impact? The question is: how can the OPDC produce a successful local destination from the start of this project, given the tensions that there are or there will be resulting from the densities and heights required to fund this national rail interchange?
  • Vision for Old Oak Common (Supplementary) [7]

    • Question by: Nicky Gavron
    • Meeting date: 07 September 2017
    Nicky Gavron AM: Good morning, Liz and Victoria. I want to ask a few questions about the industry and business premises and land in the OPDC area. You have there the largest concentration, probably, in western Europe of business and, broadly speaking, industrial premises and land. It is, arguably, the engine of London and the UK’s industrial economy. It is very farsighted of you that you have taken out an Article 4 direction to block the change of use to housing overnight from warehousing and from offices. When did that come into force as a direction?
  • Vision for Old Oak Common (Supplementary) [10]

    • Question by: Andrew Boff
    • Meeting date: 07 September 2017
    Andrew Boff AM: Developers and designers and landowners effectively will get away with what they can in terms of developments. Is there not some advantage in advance of developments being submitted for planning approval of saying what the parameters of such a development are going to be?
  • Investing in Tobacco Companies (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 13 September 2006
    The Labour Council did not vote against it, I understand.
  • Investing in Tobacco Companies (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Jennette Arnold OBE
    • Meeting date: 13 September 2006
    No, I was adding it to the statistics that he has used, so that he can use that in future.
  • TfL Street Management Efficiency and Probity (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Valerie Shawcross
    • Meeting date: 13 September 2006
    I think it is not just the efficiency that has been improved, but they have actually reduced their risk to probity now, but anyway, thank you. I will go back to TfL with some of the detail. Thank you.
  • Safe Access to Licensed Minicabs (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Valerie Shawcross
    • Meeting date: 12 July 2006
    I think we have to put some positive incentives to minicab drivers, having gone through the registration scheme. I think it would help reinforce what is a successful safety scheme
  • Racism

    • Reference: 2001/0545
    • Question by: Jennette Arnold OBE
    • Meeting date: 19 September 2001
    Does the Mayor agree with Andrew Lansley MP that the Conservative Party is endemically racist? Does this explain the lack of Black or Asian Assembly members in Tory seats on the Assembly? .
  • Bus Fares & Travelcards

    • Reference: 2001/0555
    • Question by: Meg Hillier
    • Meeting date: 19 September 2001
    Your Transport Strategy states Transport for London's intention of introducing a flat rate 70p bus fare in late 2002, making the 'zoning' system irrelevant to pay-as-you-ride bus travel. What will be the fate, when travelling by bus, of passengers holding a travelcard valid only in a few zones? .