Search questions

• Question by: Len Duvall OBE
• Meeting date: 16 March 2023

Len Duvall OBE AM: On the Stadium, since you have both been in position, we have stabilised the costs around the Stadium. We understand more about what the Stadium can do or cannot do. You have conversations with all the tenants and particularly you have opened up a relationship with the anchor tenant, but there are still legal issues and they are about the contracts that you have between your good selves. What is the future of the Stadium? What does that look like over the coming years? What are the potential options around that? Could you just give us...

• Question by: Len Duvall OBE
• Meeting date: 16 March 2023

Len Duvall OBE AM: Let us go back to real estate around the Stadium. Most of that would have been part of the open space and parkland. There are no options and nothing under your plans that you would build on that open space element that is included in your development area.

• Question by: Len Duvall OBE
• Meeting date: 05 September 2019

Len Duvall OBE AM: Thank you very much. Can we go back to the Moore Stephens report? Can you just remind us of the steps that you have taken briefly since they highlighted that your organisation was taking most of the risks around the Stadium, both in capital and in terms of operating cost?

• Question by: Len Duvall OBE
• Meeting date: 06 September 2018

Len Duvall AM: Thank you very much. Can you turn to the stadium and the Moore Stephens report [ Olympic Stadium Review ]? Can you give us an update on how you have acted upon the findings of that report? When it was published [in November 2017] it talked particularly about the estimated projected losses. I think it quoted between £10 million and £20 million a year. Is that still the figure you are working to and is it still an objective to get that figure down? I do not mind who takes it.

• Reference: 2006/0465-1
• Question by: Len Duvall OBE
• Meeting date: 06 December 2006

Given TfL's proposal to substantially reduce the car parking at North Greenwich station what steps have they taken to provide alternative parking and how do they intend to secure the future of this car park given London Underground's description of this station as a key gateway? This park and ride facility is used by my constituents from all parts of Greenwich as public transport to and from the station from some parts of the borough is inadequate. Reducing car parking will not encourage people to use public transport, as many will find it quicker to drive into central London or...

• Reference: 2006/0476-1
• Question by: Len Duvall OBE
• Meeting date: 06 December 2006

Can you clarify what will be the exact staffing arrangements at the stations on the East London Line extension? Will there be staff at the stations and ticket barriers all the time the trains are running?

• Reference: 2006/0525-1
• Question by: Len Duvall OBE
• Meeting date: 06 December 2006

Are there any plans to introduce light controlled pedestrian crossings on a) Courthill Road, Lewisham, at the junction with Lewisham High Street and b) Canadian Avenue, Catford at the junction with Catford Road?

• Reference: 2006/0019-1
• Question by: Len Duvall OBE
• Meeting date: 15 March 2006

Will TfL consider beginning a feasibility study on a third crossing at Blackwall?

• Reference: 2006/0020-1
• Question by: Len Duvall OBE
• Meeting date: 15 March 2006

Recently, a constituent happened to buy an extension ticket from zone 2 to zone 3 at a tube station, although they were planning on making that journey on the DLR. At the DLR station it costs £1.50, but anywhere else on the network charges £3. Can you explain this anomaly and what are you doing to either integrate the fares or ensure that those selling tickets are aware of this.

• Reference: 2006/0021-1
• Question by: Len Duvall OBE
• Meeting date: 15 March 2006

Further to my question to the Mayor (1747/2005) in September 2005, can you update me on TfL's discussions on setting up a compensation fund for those that are injured on London Buses, when the operators are not liable?