Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • Question and Answer Session: London Legacy Development Corporation (Supplementary) [12]

    • Question by: Len Duvall OBE
    • Meeting date: 16 March 2023
    Len Duvall OBE AM: On the Stadium, since you have both been in position, we have stabilised the costs around the Stadium. We understand more about what the Stadium can do or cannot do. You have conversations with all the tenants and particularly you have opened up a relationship with the anchor tenant, but there are still legal issues and they are about the contracts that you have between your good selves. What is the future of the Stadium? What does that look like over the coming years? What are the potential options around that? Could you just give us...
  • Question and Answer Session: London Legacy Development Corporation (Supplementary) [14]

    • Question by: Len Duvall OBE
    • Meeting date: 16 March 2023
    Len Duvall OBE AM: Let us go back to real estate around the Stadium. Most of that would have been part of the open space and parkland. There are no options and nothing under your plans that you would build on that open space element that is included in your development area.
  • Supplementary [4]

    • Question by: Len Duvall OBE
    • Meeting date: 05 September 2019
    Len Duvall OBE AM: Thank you very much. Can we go back to the Moore Stephens report? Can you just remind us of the steps that you have taken briefly since they highlighted that your organisation was taking most of the risks around the Stadium, both in capital and in terms of operating cost?
  • New Chief Executive update (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Len Duvall OBE
    • Meeting date: 06 September 2018
    Len Duvall AM: Thank you very much. Can you turn to the stadium and the Moore Stephens report [ Olympic Stadium Review ]? Can you give us an update on how you have acted upon the findings of that report? When it was published [in November 2017] it talked particularly about the estimated projected losses. I think it quoted between £10 million and £20 million a year. Is that still the figure you are working to and is it still an objective to get that figure down? I do not mind who takes it.
  • Leveson Inquiry (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Len Duvall OBE
    • Meeting date: 20 December 2012
    There are the Leveson recommendations and then there are things that the police can do over and above Leveson themselves. If we go to the heart of the issues of investigating the rich and powerful, the checks and balances on judgement calls. From the original investigation of limiting to the few - not going in and looking at the wider evidence but it sits there in a room or whatever - to other issues of when you do the recall are the checks and balances internally and judgement calls about investigating issues. Is there something more that the police can...
  • Leveson Inquiry (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Len Duvall OBE
    • Meeting date: 20 December 2012
    Can we look at the MOPAC role now? My question is directly to Stephen. There are two questions and thank you. I think you have provided the Committee with some correspondence from the previous questions around this issue. Can you just explain to us how the MOPAC plans to oversee the Metropolitan Police Service implementation of the Leveson recommendations will work? I understand there was an Audit Committee yesterday. Can you also then demonstrate how yours and the Mayor's relationships with the press will be transparent? That was an item that I think you alluded to in the correspondence that...
  • Drug Intervention Programme (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Len Duvall OBE
    • Meeting date: 20 December 2012
    I just want to clarify a bit on that transparency process, and it goes a bit back to some earlier answers you gave on the future of community safety funding plus the DIP money. OK, not all of it, but some of it is MOPAC's money and I think in your desire for joint commissioning, is it joint decision-making or is the ultimate decision going to be with MOPAC or with the London Crime Reduction Board? What is the line of accountability? Is it ultimately advisory to you, you sign it off, or are you going to share that decision...
  • Project Daedalus (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Len Duvall OBE
    • Meeting date: 20 December 2012
    Can we move away from the preplanned operations and some of the specialist operations, and talk to what is available in boroughs in terms of response? Just to get to the bottom of two cars, four officers being added and TSG group already in existence, could you just explain to me, would they only be available to certain boroughs in terms of tasking? Do they get round to all boroughs? They do not stay in one particular borough. I presume on top of that there are existing roving armed response vehicles that are Taser-led, so they could respond to a...
  • Leveson Inquiry (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Len Duvall OBE
    • Meeting date: 29 November 2012
    Of course, Lord Justice Leveson will be commenting about the policing relationships with the media and he will also be commenting about politicians' relationships with the media. Can we ask, Chair, both for yourself and the Mayor about the transparency of relationships, about meeting with the press? Of course, it is much more difficult for the Mayor but, clearly, if the police are going to be undertaking some duties, what is MOPAC doing? We are meant to be overseeing you in terms of those relationships. Can you come back to this Committee if it is appropriate about how you plan...
  • Budget proposals (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Len Duvall OBE
    • Meeting date: 29 November 2012
    I have three quick points. Can we go back to earlier on about the labelling and the various boxes? Let us not deal with the 6,000-odd officers that you are looking at and analysing some of the issues that you said we wanted to be careful about taking decisions in relation to those. Let us concentrate on the 2,000 officers which presumably are the ones that you are going to be implementing for April 2013. I presume both of you want an honest debate with Londoners about the provision of policing. I cannot quite see Stephen's nod but I take...