Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • Question and Answer Session: London Legacy Development Corporation (Supplementary) [12]

    • Question by: Len Duvall OBE
    • Meeting date: 16 March 2023
    Len Duvall OBE AM: On the Stadium, since you have both been in position, we have stabilised the costs around the Stadium. We understand more about what the Stadium can do or cannot do. You have conversations with all the tenants and particularly you have opened up a relationship with the anchor tenant, but there are still legal issues and they are about the contracts that you have between your good selves. What is the future of the Stadium? What does that look like over the coming years? What are the potential options around that? Could you just give us...
  • Question and Answer Session: London Legacy Development Corporation (Supplementary) [14]

    • Question by: Len Duvall OBE
    • Meeting date: 16 March 2023
    Len Duvall OBE AM: Let us go back to real estate around the Stadium. Most of that would have been part of the open space and parkland. There are no options and nothing under your plans that you would build on that open space element that is included in your development area.
  • Supplementary [4]

    • Question by: Len Duvall OBE
    • Meeting date: 05 September 2019
    Len Duvall OBE AM: Thank you very much. Can we go back to the Moore Stephens report? Can you just remind us of the steps that you have taken briefly since they highlighted that your organisation was taking most of the risks around the Stadium, both in capital and in terms of operating cost?
  • New Chief Executive update (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Len Duvall OBE
    • Meeting date: 06 September 2018
    Len Duvall AM: Thank you very much. Can you turn to the stadium and the Moore Stephens report [ Olympic Stadium Review ]? Can you give us an update on how you have acted upon the findings of that report? When it was published [in November 2017] it talked particularly about the estimated projected losses. I think it quoted between £10 million and £20 million a year. Is that still the figure you are working to and is it still an objective to get that figure down? I do not mind who takes it.
  • Paying for Local Policing

    • Reference: 2003/0354
    • Question by: Len Duvall OBE
    • Meeting date: 10 December 2003
    Is more effective policing, including the expansion of neighbourhood policing, dependent on increased spending? .
  • Role of MPA Chair

    • Reference: 2003/0360
    • Question by: Len Duvall OBE
    • Meeting date: 10 December 2003
    How many days a week is enough to fulfil the role of the Chair of the MPA? .
  • Policing Greenwich

    • Reference: 2003/0365
    • Question by: Len Duvall OBE
    • Meeting date: 10 December 2003
    How many police officers from Greenwich are policing central London? What has been the impact on police numbers in Greenwich? Has crime increased? .
  • Policing Lewisham

    • Reference: 2003/0367
    • Question by: Len Duvall OBE
    • Meeting date: 10 December 2003
    How many police officers from Lewisham are policing central London? What has been the impact on police numbers in Lewisham? Has crime increased? .
  • Police Mergers

    • Reference: 2003/0378
    • Question by: Len Duvall OBE
    • Meeting date: 10 December 2003
    In light of the Green paper on policing, what future do you see for the City of London Police, Royal Parks Constabulary and British Transport Police in London? .
  • Grant Settlement (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Len Duvall OBE
    • Meeting date: 10 December 2003
    In light of the grant settlement, I wonder whether it is time to revisit the level of efficiency savings you are requested to make. What representations have you made to the Mayor and what is the MPA's thinking on that? Maybe you are aware of this, but there is no comfort in terms of the other side if they ever got into national power because they say they would create extra grant for the police in terms of extra resources by savings on asylum policy, a policy based on some `fantasy island" in which they would put asylum seekers and...