Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • Priorities for the Coming Year (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Murad Qureshi
    • Meeting date: 10 November 2007
    Just going on from John's [Biggs] friendly question, you outlined many, many priorities for next year and, if anything, the first observation is maybe there are too many. Can you possibly lose focus as a result and what kind of managerial systems have you got to make sure that you can cover all the ground? For example, the two additional ones that I had were implementing the Mayor's Housing Strategy and the sporting provision and the youth service. Now those are clearly new areas on top of your Olympic responsibilities, as well as the climate change work.
  • London City Airport (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Geoff Pope
    • Meeting date: 10 November 2007
    Can you say anything about the timescale of this application?
  • Grant Settlement (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 10 December 2003
    I will return to the politics of the situation in a moment. Firstly, can I ask Sir John for his professional take on the situation? Previously you were eloquently talking about the national responsibilities of the Met and our specific grant covering those of £200 million or so, is rising by 2.5%, less than the rate of inflation. I would really welcome your insight as to what you think the Government is up to. Given the stress we are under in London because of our national and international responsibilities why does central Government not seem to be recognising that, from...
  • Young People (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Graham Tope
    • Meeting date: 10 December 2003
    Graham Tope (AM): I do not think any of us would want to suggest that this was an issue solely for the Met to deal with; I took that as a given. Toby mentioned earlier the issue of bullying. Quite often bullying of young people whether inside or outside school is regarded as something that is part of growing up. Is that the attitude that the Met takes, and if it is not as I hope, how do you work with local authorities and other agencies to address the issue of bullying amongst young people?
  • Young People (Supplementary) [7]

    • Question by: Graham Tope
    • Meeting date: 10 December 2003
  • Young People (Supplementary) [8]

    • Question by: Diana Johnson
    • Meeting date: 10 December 2003
    Diana Johnson (AM): It is about the Cadet Corps. As the link member for Havering, Barking and Dagenham I have been very impressed by their Cadet Corps. What do you think is the future for the Cadet Corps?
  • Young People (Supplementary) [9]

    • Question by: Graham Tope
    • Meeting date: 10 December 2003
    Graham Tope (AM): Perhaps I may direct this at Sir John as well. The LSE and South Bank University study on Policing for London found that dissatisfaction with the police was greatest amongst the young. They said that their `focus groups brought out the intensity with which many young people see police activity as biased against them and based on negative stereotypes of youth'. What is being done to address that perception? More particularly, where do children and young people fit into models of community-based policing that we are hoping to move towards?
  • Domestic Violence (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Graham Tope
    • Meeting date: 10 December 2003
    I very much welcome the huge change in the Met's attitude to domestic violence over recent years. It is a complete turnaround and very welcome. I also welcome the answers we have had today. The report from the London Domestic Violence Forum stated amongst many other things that `Training for frontline officers in particular remains an urgent priority'. How is that being addressed?
  • Domestic Violence (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 10 December 2003
  • Domestic Violence (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 10 December 2003
    So it would be a disciplinary board and not a conviction?