Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • London Development Agency Funding of Organisations (Supplementary) [17]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 16 January 2008
    Just to clear up the point about when the report was released I think it went to the Board at 9 am or so and the press release came out 3 pm or 4 pm. I could not get the report itself off the LDA website until close to 7 pm on a Friday evening.
  • Community Fire Safety Work (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 08 November 2006
    Am I right in saying that the target for the percentage of time spent on community fire safety at station level has risen from 6 per cent to 8 per cent? Looking at the actual performance last year, over a third of our stations exceeded 10 per cent and one of them, Sutton, according to the figures, spent 25 per cent of their time on community fire safety. Is not 8 per cent really too low as a target, therefore, and should we not be getting the average a lot higher?
  • Community Fire Safety Work (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 08 November 2006
    If some can achieve above 20 per cent, can we not encourage the others too?
  • Brownfield Land (Supplementary) [9]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 11 October 2006
    It is obviously crucial that we get this brownfield development right if we are to protect greenfield and indeed the green belt. The figures I have in the decade before the LDA was set up, so in the 1990s, we lost the equivalent of Richmond Park in greenfield development and in this decade we have been losing St James's Park every year, that is development on greenfield sites. So, with that context, do you think that the the LDA's annual target of, I think is it 50 or 55 hectares a year, is adequate?
  • Barriers to Employment (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 11 October 2006
    I have a question on this very topic later, question 136, if your notes help you; still on the same subject of tackling barriers to employment and unemployment. It simply does not ring true to me what you have been saying as to why there is such disparity between London and the rest of the country. If you talk to your colleagues in Liverpool or Newcastle or even single-industry towns like Bradford or Oldham, they will be green with envy with the opportunities we have in London. So, can you return to this question of this gap between employment rates...
  • Barriers to Employment (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 11 October 2006
    An awful lot of that is migration and that is people coming because they perceive that the jobs are here. So, intuitively that should not be working. If the jobs are not here, that should not be driving migration. They should actually be going out of London to where the jobs are. There is stronger jobs growth outside London.
  • Barriers to Employment (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 11 October 2006
    I agree we have those problems. I am not sure they are so extremely different from other parts of the country. But against that, we have massive opportunities in London that single-industry towns, where the industries closed in the north of the country, do not have. In terms of the LDA, whatever the causes of it, the facts are there, that it is getting worse in London compared to the rest of the country. In terms of what the LDA is doing about it, your snapshot is very stark. The ones with red blobs are in this area and all...
  • Barriers to Employment (Supplementary) [17]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 11 October 2006
    That is them rather than you, because when the Mayor is taxed on this issue he says `Oh well, when I get more powers over skills all will be well'. But actually the LDA has been up and running, and you are in your sixth year now. What I am trying to understand is what more ought you to be doing or what more ought you to have done, given that you are, at heart, an economic development agency and the primary indicator of economic growth is the number of jobs created.
  • London Fire Safety Plan (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 09 November 2005
    Okay, if I can just take it in stages. In terms of the progress, and clearly there is time involved, but we are on course to get all 10 relocated by March 2006 as per the plan, I hope.
  • London Fire Safety Plan (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 09 November 2005
    The related changes in the London Safety Plan around the location of the Command Support Unit and the Driver Training Centre ' are they also'