Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • Investing in Tobacco Companies (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Mike Tuffrey
    • Meeting date: 13 September 2006
    The Labour Council did not vote against it, I understand.
  • Investing in Tobacco Companies (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Jennette Arnold OBE
    • Meeting date: 13 September 2006
    No, I was adding it to the statistics that he has used, so that he can use that in future.
  • TfL Street Management Efficiency and Probity (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Valerie Shawcross
    • Meeting date: 13 September 2006
    I think it is not just the efficiency that has been improved, but they have actually reduced their risk to probity now, but anyway, thank you. I will go back to TfL with some of the detail. Thank you.
  • Safe Access to Licensed Minicabs (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Valerie Shawcross
    • Meeting date: 12 July 2006
    I think we have to put some positive incentives to minicab drivers, having gone through the registration scheme. I think it would help reinforce what is a successful safety scheme
  • LDA Board Meetings (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Tony Arbour
    • Meeting date: 10 October 2001
  • LDA Board Meetings (Supplementary) [2]

    • Question by: Lynne Featherstone
    • Meeting date: 10 October 2001
    Thank you. I think you have just demonstrated the point, actually. You've given a reasonably full answer on tourism, which is something we should have had before. If it wasn't Functional Bodies Question Time today, would we have had that information? The point about this whole debate, and I think you're getting it cross-party actually, is the feeling that you stick out like a sore thumb in your attitude towards openness and accountability, not just to the public. I would like these meetings all to be public and I would like all the information. What you've said today should have...
  • LDA Board Meetings (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: Meg Hillier
    • Meeting date: 10 October 2001
    I share a number of the concerns that Tony's outlined and if we can perhaps particularly focus on the website. We're supposed to be, as the GLA family, into open government and the web approach was something that was an ethos that the Mayor and others agree is a great way of people having access. However, if you go onto the LDA website it seems, as Tony says, that you control what comes out in terms of press releases and I haven't yet managed to find the minutes on the website. Maybe I'm just not very good at browsing. But...
  • LDA Board Meetings (Supplementary) [9]

    • Question by: Jennette Arnold OBE
    • Meeting date: 10 October 2001
    Michael, rumours are flying around about the large amount of jobs that have been lost to date. Can you not give us an assurance and tell us are we talking thousands of jobs to date or what have you got that you can share with us today?
  • LDA Properties (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Elizabeth Howlett
    • Meeting date: 10 October 2001
    Have you ear-marked any sites for which you have considered the possibility of using this method?
  • LDA Properties (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Elizabeth Howlett
    • Meeting date: 10 October 2001
    I'm sure we would all like to know if you intend activating these powers and whether, in fact, these properties are in habitation at the present time and why you would consider using compulsory purchase orders for the greater gain of what? Because local authorities very rarely now use them. It's usually only for road building. But I would be interested to know in which area you would consider using it.