Search questions

• Reference: 2006/0392-1
• Question by: Brian Coleman
• Meeting date: 15 November 2006

Mr Lemley also predicted that, despite your assurances, Games venues will not be delivered on schedule. Please can you confirm the date on which construction work on the stadium, the aquatic centre and the Olympic village will be completed?

• Reference: 2006/0104-1
• Question by: Darren Johnson
• Meeting date: 14 June 2006

Existing planning permission for the Stratford City development specifies that a minimum of 2% of energy requirements of the development be provided from locally resourced renewable energy. This is a long way short of the commitment in Towards a One Planet Olympics for an 'Athletes' Village capable of being energy self-sufficient'. As part of the Athletes' Village will now be sited within the Stratford City development, will the ODA seek new planning permission, specifying the Athletes' Village as a Zero-Energy Development? If not, how will the ODA ensure that the Athletes' Village is "energy self -sufficient"?

• Reference: 2006/0109-1
• Question by: Mike Tuffrey
• Meeting date: 14 June 2006

What estimate have you made of the amount of carbon that will be produced in the construction of the Olympic Park?

• Reference: 2006/0112-1
• Question by: Damian Hockney
• Meeting date: 14 June 2006

What plans have you made to ensure that a proportion of the contracts will go to local firms and will provide employment to local residents, particularly if they have lost jobs as a result of firms having to close down for the development of the Olympic infrastructure?

• Reference: 2006/0114-1
• Question by: Bob Blackman
• Meeting date: 14 June 2006

Are you happy with the progress made so far by the LDA in relation to land assembly and preparation? Do you believe that the original bid document and budget, sufficiently took into account the rise in inflation relating to construction costs?

• Reference: 2006/0117-1
• Question by: Jennette Arnold OBE
• Meeting date: 14 June 2006

What more can you tell us about the changes that are being considered to the bid document, as revealed by the Chair of the IOC Commission at the press conference on 21st April 2006, during the IOC's visit to London?

• Reference: 2006/0118-1
• Question by: John Biggs
• Meeting date: 14 June 2006

What progress have you made with defining and developing working relationships with local authorities and other public partners. What if any formal structures are you proposing, to ensure that issues, particularly legacy issues, are properly and adequately dealt with without creating bureaucracy and risking possible delay to the Olympic projects?

• Question by: Tony Arbour
• Meeting date: 10 October 2001

• Question by: Lynne Featherstone
• Meeting date: 10 October 2001

Thank you. I think you have just demonstrated the point, actually. You've given a reasonably full answer on tourism, which is something we should have had before. If it wasn't Functional Bodies Question Time today, would we have had that information? The point about this whole debate, and I think you're getting it cross-party actually, is the feeling that you stick out like a sore thumb in your attitude towards openness and accountability, not just to the public. I would like these meetings all to be public and I would like all the information. What you've said today should have...

• Question by: Meg Hillier
• Meeting date: 10 October 2001

I share a number of the concerns that Tony's outlined and if we can perhaps particularly focus on the website. We're supposed to be, as the GLA family, into open government and the web approach was something that was an ethos that the Mayor and others agree is a great way of people having access. However, if you go onto the LDA website it seems, as Tony says, that you control what comes out in terms of press releases and I haven't yet managed to find the minutes on the website. Maybe I'm just not very good at browsing. But...