Search questions

• Reference: 2008/0196
• Question by: Tony Arbour
• Meeting date: 30 January 2008

According to his latest Decision List, the Mayor spent £245,000 on the recent 'Light Bulb Amnesty' (£118,000 by the GLA and £127,000 by TfL). How much money was spent on marketing and publicity, and how much was spent on the light bulbs themselves?

• Reference: 2008/0198
• Question by: Tony Arbour
• Meeting date: 30 January 2008

How many traditional light bulbs were exchanged in the 'Light Bulb Amnesty', and how were these disposed of?

• Reference: 2007/0261-1
• Question by: Tony Arbour
• Meeting date: 05 December 2007

Large parts of my constituency have no tube access and thus my constituents who commute are almost completely reliant on train travel. Does the Commissioner believe that South-West London is getting a fair deal on public transport and is Transport for London doing enough to help my constituents?

• Reference: 2006/1772
• Question by: Tony Arbour
• Meeting date: 12 July 2006

In your Draft Alterations to the London Plan, the sub regions are heavily reliant upon new and upgraded transport links, can you please state how you expect the sub-regions to cope with the annual increase in housing/population when transport links such as Crossrail 1, the East London Line extension and upgrades to the underground will not be completed for a few years to come?

• Reference: 2006/0115-1
• Question by: Tony Arbour
• Meeting date: 14 June 2006

Can you clarify the precise remits of the ODA and LDA?

• Reference: 2004/1601
• Question by: Tony Arbour
• Meeting date: 17 November 2004

Following on from question number 1393/2004, should not the priority be to ensure adequate schooling is provided locally before embarking on social engineering?

• Reference: 2003/0420
• Question by: Tony Arbour
• Meeting date: 10 December 2003

How will the RAF be reviewed to take into account the amount of precept paid by boroughs like Kingston and Richmond upon Thames and the number of police officers allocated to those boroughs? .

• Reference: 2003/0421
• Question by: Tony Arbour
• Meeting date: 10 December 2003

How does the Formula compensate for the disproportionate effect of fixed costs on small boroughs like Kingston and Richmond upon Thames? .

• Reference: 2003/0448-1
• Question by: Tony Arbour
• Meeting date: 10 December 2003

As a previous Leader of a London Borough with a "Weak" rating under Comprehensive Performance Assessment from the independent Audit Commission does he accept the organisation and corporate performance of the MPA under his leadership is even worst than Haringey, and if not how can he prove it and will he announce that the MPA will be inviting the Audit Commission to start a CPA Inspection ? .

• Question by: Tony Arbour
• Meeting date: 10 December 2003

Be that as it may, you made it quite clear yourself that there is no proper distinguishing between the allocation of these costs. You have merely suggested that there is a matching. I think that we ought to have known precisely what comes in and what goes out. Nevertheless, this really means that we really ought to be discussing once again the question of a national police force. I will tell you why it has become even more important this morning. Do you accept, as the Commissioner accepted in the response to the first debate this morning, that as he...