Search questions

• Reference: 2007/0027-1
• Question by: Sally Hamwee
• Meeting date: 13 June 2007

What work have you done for Transport for London under your Consultancy Agreement?

• Reference: 2007/0028-1
• Question by: Sally Hamwee
• Meeting date: 13 June 2007

What is the purpose of the Consultancy Agreement between TfL and Bob Kiley and how does it offer value for money?

• Reference: 2007/0030-1
• Question by: Sally Hamwee
• Meeting date: 13 June 2007

Why was the Agreement structured so as to prevent TfL from being able to require Mr Kiley to work at TfL's offices after June 2007?

• Reference: 2007/0031-1
• Question by: Sally Hamwee
• Meeting date: 13 June 2007

What administrative, office and secretarial support has been provided to Bob Kiley under the Agreement? What has been the cost of this support?

• Reference: 2007/0032-1
• Question by: Sally Hamwee
• Meeting date: 13 June 2007

On how many occasions and for what purpose has TfL paid for air or rail travel for Mr Kiley under the Consultancy Agreement?

• Reference: 2007/0033-1
• Question by: Sally Hamwee
• Meeting date: 13 June 2007

Why are the records of Mr Kiley's expense claims incomplete? [No records of prior authorisation of expenses, no supporting information/evidence in support of the first three invoices, and lost receipt in relation to invoice No. 7]

• Reference: 2007/0034-1
• Question by: Sally Hamwee
• Meeting date: 13 June 2007

Why did TfL pay expenses for a dinner to plan a speech at the Salzburg Seminar (of which Bob Kiley is listed on the Salzburg Seminar website as a Fellow and former member of the Board of Directors) but no expenses for the seminar itself?

• Question by: Damian Hockney
• Meeting date: 15 February 2007

All right, David. One thing that I am a bit concerned about is that, if you look, for example, at the actual stadium and you look at the original quote of £280 million, the Government has now acknowledged it will be higher than that because of the fact that you want a legacy from it; you do not just want a temporary 80,000 seat stadium. Now, the problem is that that tends to indicate to me that no account initially was taken of a possible legacy use, so therefore there is at least another £100 million in costs. Ignore the...

• Question by: Damian Hockney
• Meeting date: 15 February 2007

If I turn to other areas, you mentioned - Sydney and Athens, and so on. My problem with the situation is, if you look at Athens, and, five years earlier, at a lot of the other venues, and with things like rowing and so on, these things were promised to be legacy. If you look at all the original stuff, it said, `this will be legacy'. But the rowing area now has, sort of, environmentally despoiled a wetlands area. The problem is, I cannot find any situation where I can trust claims. It all seems very pie in the sky...

• Question by: Andrew Pelling
• Meeting date: 15 February 2007

I am very grateful for Mr Biggs mentioning Croydon and Sutton, and I will just briefly touch on that in the limited time that I have. Recently the Department for Work and Pensions came up with figures for Croydon Central Parliamentary Constituency. It is 14th in terms of number of lone parents who are on income support, so there is a very real need to recognise the importance of investing in this area in terms of social deprivation. But my question is actually about the question which Mr Biggs has down about the economic development impact. I would declare an...