Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

  • Housing Demand (Supplementary) [7]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 24 October 2007
    So why have you set such a low limit? Why not 25% or 30%?
  • Housing Demand (Supplementary) [11]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 24 October 2007
    Finally, what are you going to do about the still considerable number of empty properties that are not brought onto the housing market at all?
  • Housing Demand (Supplementary) [17]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 24 October 2007
    The key is that when those properties come available, there is a queue a mile long to acquire them. So, there is clearly a need for more of those types of properties.
  • Housing Demand (Supplementary) [25]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 24 October 2007
    Two quick areas I would just like to raise: how are you going to address the need for new affordable housing for families when we have already got a surplus of one bedroom properties at affordable level, and a large element of the developments that have taken place have been two bedroom properties? In actual fact the demand now in London is very much for family housing, both for affordable housing for rent but also housing that can be bought by families.
  • Housing Demand (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 24 October 2007
    Why then has the Mayor opposed, for example, what Wandsworth has been doing to bring back empty homes into the housing market?
  • Sporting Legacy (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 15 February 2007
    But to paraphrase what you said, Paul, it is suggested to me that we will not see any extra facilities, as a result of having training facilities here. All we will see is maybe some improvements to existing facilities.
  • Sporting Legacy (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 15 February 2007
    Lord Coe, you have gone on record as saying that the Olympics is not about budgets and additional infrastructure, it is about ambition and legacy. How is the current row over the budget for the main Olympic Stadium actually having an effect on the legacy, for example, for the main Olympic Stadium?
  • Sporting Legacy (Supplementary) [7]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 15 February 2007
    Well, the report suggests that the requirement for legacy, ie reducing the capacity of the stadium, is driving the increasing costs. And I think that is a terribly important issue --
  • Sporting Legacy (Supplementary) [9]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 15 February 2007
    Reports are saying that the main contractor is coming back and saying that the cost of the Olympic Stadium has doubled. Can you confirm that?
  • Sporting Legacy (Supplementary) [11]

    • Question by: Bob Blackman
    • Meeting date: 15 February 2007
    One of the areas, of course, that you refer to, and I think we can build on, is providing training facilities for teams coming to the Olympics. They need first rate facilities, but could be built all over London and therefore be a lasting legacy for Londoners, be they from the west or east, north or south, to participate in sport later. Can you give us a guarantee about what the plan is for rolling that out?