Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

Meeting type

Organisation

Question by 1

Status

Year

  • Housing Demand (Supplementary) [15]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 24 October 2007
    Two short points, if I might, on that. Are you saying then, Neale, can I be clear, that the developments which are currently proposed are not dependent, for example, therefore, on the extension of the Docklands Light Railway (DLR) down to Rainham?

  • Housing Demand (Supplementary) [18]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 24 October 2007
    Finally, can I take if from what you said that the Mayor will continue to oppose any nationalisation, in effect, of the Section 106 legal agreement monies through a national Planning Gain Supplement (PGS).

  • Housing Demand (Supplementary) [28]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 24 October 2007
    My apologies for not having been in at the beginning of the conversation, Neale; I was actually in the Thames Gateway meeting some residents in Bexley earlier on. I just wanted to take up one of the points that was raised and that is this: the clear view of all the partners, both in London Thames Gateway and in Essex and in Kent, is that you will only be able to deliver sustainable communities in the Gateway if the infrastructure is put in before the housing. There seems to be no evidence of that. Given that Crossrail is likely to...

  • Accountability of the Mayor's Advisors (Supplementary) [9]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 12 January 2005
    Mr O'Neill, can you tell me what your responsibilities are?

  • Accountability of the Mayor's Advisors (Supplementary) [10]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 12 January 2005
    How much of your brief is taken up by transport?

  • Accountability of the Mayor's Advisors (Supplementary) [11]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 12 January 2005
    I am therefore intrigued that of the 45 members of staff who work for you, as listed in the GLA intranet, not one of them has the word `transport' in their job description. All of them appear to relate to the public affairs side of the brief. How does that come about?

  • Accountability of the Mayor's Advisors (Supplementary) [12]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 12 January 2005
    They are working for her and not for you.

  • Accountability of the Mayor's Advisors (Supplementary) [13]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 12 January 2005
    Do you give instructions to those members of staff?

  • Accountability of the Mayor's Advisors (Supplementary) [14]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 12 January 2005
    How does their manager know what instructions to give for carrying out the Mayor's wishes?

  • Accountability of the Mayor's Advisors (Supplementary) [24]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 12 January 2005
    That is a very interesting example of transparency. Finally, I could not get an answer last time, but since Mr O'Neill is here, who is responsible for the editorial comment of The Londoner? You were not able to answer it last time, Mr Mayor.