Search questions

• Reference: 2003/0419
• Question by: Elizabeth Howlett
• Meeting date: 10 December 2003

The MPS step change business case makes clear that increased infrastructure provision will be required if the step change programme is to be fully effective. How much will this increased infrastructure add on to the total cost of the step change programme? .

• Reference: 2003/0438
• Question by: Elizabeth Howlett
• Meeting date: 10 December 2003

How will the MPA use its statutory role on Borough CDRPs to make them more effective? .

• Question by: Elizabeth Howlett
• Meeting date: 10 December 2003

As link member for Bromley, I just wonder, Lord Harris, whether in fact you have the right information. The Chief Superintendent has managed to change the duty roster and he also has a charging unit for the sergeant that runs it so that when an officer comes in with an offender he is handed over to the charging unit. The officer is then able to go out on to the streets again, which increases visibility. I wonder whether you have the right information because certainly they have the highest visibility of officers in the Met. I would like to ask...

• Question by: Elizabeth Howlett
• Meeting date: 10 December 2003

We are not trying to put barriers in the way of Step Change. Like everybody else we think Step Change is an excellent initiative. The barrier is affordability, particularly given the savage cuts the Government has hit all of London's public services with this year. On the issue of affordability, I would like ask two things. Have you had assurance, or even a nod and a wink from Government Ministers, that after next year's pilot which will cost £26.2 million, yes the money would be forthcoming from Government sources? It certainly cannot come from Londoners. As we look forward to...

• Reference: 2002/0345-1
• Question by: Elizabeth Howlett
• Meeting date: 11 December 2002

Tuberculosis and rickets in children are on the increase in certain parts of London. What have you been doing about it? .

• Reference: 2002/0339-1
• Question by: Elizabeth Howlett
• Meeting date: 11 December 2002

Do you not agree that housing targets should be based on a five year rolling review programme? Planning permissions given now should not be based on optimistic assumptions on new infrastructure in the future.

• Reference: 2002/0340-1
• Question by: Elizabeth Howlett
• Meeting date: 11 December 2002

Do you not agree that the Mayor's projections for growth are based on trends and fail to address the risk to Londoners' quality of life? He encourages high-density developments on already cramped built up areas which will alter the character of communities throughout the capital.

• Reference: 2002/0341-1
• Question by: Elizabeth Howlett
• Meeting date: 11 December 2002

With the Mayor's insistence that 1 in 3 homes should be for social housing, do you agree that he is rejecting the aspirations of people of all income levels to own their own homes, and that middle income households will lose out in a London divided between people in higher priced homes and those who qualify for subsidised housing? .

• Reference: 2002/0342-1
• Question by: Elizabeth Howlett
• Meeting date: 11 December 2002

What advice are you giving the Mayor about the dangers inherent in a low take-up of childhood immunisation in certain parts of London? .

• Reference: 2002/0343-1
• Question by: Elizabeth Howlett
• Meeting date: 11 December 2002

What can the Mayor's office do with regard to the ageing population of GPs and the every increasing and worrying vacancy level in GP practices? .