Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

  • Economic Impact (Supplementary) [3]

    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 15 February 2007
    On this issue of economic boost, clearly it would give London and economic boost if we committed to a living wage for all the workers. Is this going to be -- I know the ODA is working with London citizens to ease this forward. Is this going to be living wage Olympics? Are we going to be globally embarrassed?
  • Environmental Commitments (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 15 February 2007
    Can I come on to LOCOG? Let us talk about a deadline that LOCOG actually had, which was for a sustainability management system that was promised immediately following the election of the host city. As far as I know that still has not happened.
  • Environmental Commitments (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 15 February 2007
    David, I am actually one of the stakeholders and also of course the Royal Institute for British Architects (RIBA) are also stakeholders and neither of us is happy. In fact, for example, RIBA actually said `the ODA sustainability policy is a disappointing missed opportunity'. From our point of view, we do not how you can call some of these measures exemplary, you know, when they will already be backed by Building Regulations by 2010. It has got to be bigger than something we are getting two years before the Olympics. You know, whether it is water usage, or the energy...
  • Environmental Commitments (Supplementary) [7]

    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 15 February 2007
    Forgive me, I do not doubt your intention to make this the greenest Olympics ever. I do not doubt that, but I do doubt your ability to do it without really good advice. One of the big issues that really offends me is there is going to be a commission for sustainable London 2012, and there seems to be delays in getting this going and the fact is you need that scrutiny body. It is very, very important for you to have that, because there is expert advice there, on hand, with an overview of the sort of thing that...
  • Energy Strategy

    • Reference: 2001/0079-1
    • Question by: Victor Anderson
    • Meeting date: 11 July 2001
    What role will he play in the drawing up and implementation of the Energy Strategy? .
  • Spatial Development Strategy

    • Reference: 2001/0077-1
    • Question by: Victor Anderson
    • Meeting date: 11 July 2001
    What role will he play in the drawing up of the Spatial Development Strategy? .
  • Pedestrianisation Schemes

    • Reference: 2001/0078-1
    • Question by: Jenny Jones
    • Meeting date: 11 July 2001
    What possibilities is he considering for pedestrianisation schemes? . (Victor Anderson) In the advice that you give, will you be giving advice about pedestrianisation schemes, because you have spoken in favour of them in the past and they are also referred to in general terms in the document. But there is only one specific scheme that is proposed in the document which is the one at Trafalgar Square. Will you be pressing for others? .
  • Spatial Development Strategy (Supplementary) [7]

    • Question by: Victor Anderson
    • Meeting date: 11 July 2001
    What advice will you give to the Mayor about the two different views in the proposals document about development of London? One of the views in the document is the emphasis on orbital public transport routes creating a city of interchanges. The other view is that there are four development corridors which link the City of London and central London to existing airports or a possible future airport in North Thames. With these two contrasting views in the same document, what view will you take?
  • Spatial Development Strategy (Supplementary) [8]

    • Question by: Victor Anderson
    • Meeting date: 11 July 2001
    Do you think that the SDS will be able to deliver a better quality design that you have talked about? Because I think that there is a danger that we will have a rhetoric about better quality design but not actually mechanisms for achieving it.