Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 2

Meeting type

Organisation

Question by 1

Status

  • Jack Lemley (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    I might have to ask elsewhere. Let us get it in context. We now know that he had expressed concerns - I think was your phrase - that the project was not on track. This is not a rogue member of the Board, this is the person who is the Chair of the Authority expressing those concerns. What specifically were the concerns that he raised?

  • Jack Lemley (Supplementary) [14]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    That came from some other source that speculation did it?

  • Jack Lemley (Supplementary) [15]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    What was the line that was put out, can you remind me?

  • Jack Lemley (Supplementary) [16]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    When Mr Lemley left, as I recall, it was suggested that it was because of ill health. Is that correct?

  • Jack Lemley (Supplementary) [18]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    You do not know whether there was any provision that might give rise to discussion on that?

  • Jack Lemley (Supplementary) [19]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    I understand. Was there any payment made to Mr Lemley in relation to the termination of his position?

  • Legacy (Supplementary) [1]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 10 October 2006
    Yes, indeed. Now obviously we want to try it. As you say, the key word is `if', so I am just interested for the future as to what we can do to try and make sure, as far as possible, there are not losses of those kind.

  • Legacy (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 10 October 2006
    I think that has been very positive and I am grateful for those answers. I was surprised to see something in the sports section of the Daily Telegraph the other week which seemed to suggest that the Mayor had undertaken to underwrite losses of some £10 million a year on the Olympic Park after 2012. I was surprised to see that and I wondered if you could shed any light on where that comes from and where we are about the future financing of those issues? All of us obviously want to see the maximum use and the maximum public...

  • Legacy (Supplementary) [6]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 10 October 2006
    Can you just help me; Is there any timeframe put on that or not?

  • Legacy (Supplementary) [7]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 10 October 2006
    As far as you are aware?