Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 1

  • Jack Lemley (Supplementary) [4]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    I might have to ask elsewhere. Let us get it in context. We now know that he had expressed concerns - I think was your phrase - that the project was not on track. This is not a rogue member of the Board, this is the person who is the Chair of the Authority expressing those concerns. What specifically were the concerns that he raised?
  • Jack Lemley (Supplementary) [14]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    That came from some other source that speculation did it?
  • Jack Lemley (Supplementary) [15]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    What was the line that was put out, can you remind me?
  • Jack Lemley (Supplementary) [16]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    When Mr Lemley left, as I recall, it was suggested that it was because of ill health. Is that correct?
  • Jack Lemley (Supplementary) [18]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    You do not know whether there was any provision that might give rise to discussion on that?
  • Jack Lemley (Supplementary) [19]

    • Question by: Bob Neill
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    I understand. Was there any payment made to Mr Lemley in relation to the termination of his position?
  • Budget (Supplementary) [7]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    But you cannot give a guarantee?
  • Budget (Supplementary) [12]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    Okay, so the environment is a major feature, but we may have to see some scaling down on the bid commitments because of cost overruns?
  • Budget (Supplementary) [16]

    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    On the budget issue, we saw environmental and legacy commitments being scaled back in Athens as a result of going over budget. Can you give an absolute guarantee that there will be no scaling back in London from what was promised in the bid documents?
  • Renewable Energy

    • Reference: 2006/0104-1
    • Question by: Darren Johnson
    • Meeting date: 14 June 2006
    Existing planning permission for the Stratford City development specifies that a minimum of 2% of energy requirements of the development be provided from locally resourced renewable energy. This is a long way short of the commitment in Towards a One Planet Olympics for an 'Athletes' Village capable of being energy self-sufficient'. As part of the Athletes' Village will now be sited within the Stratford City development, will the ODA seek new planning permission, specifying the Athletes' Village as a Zero-Energy Development? If not, how will the ODA ensure that the Athletes' Village is "energy self -sufficient"?