Skip to main content
Mayor of London logo London Assembly logo
Home

Search questions

Filter results

Asked of 1

  • Jack Lemley (Supplementary) [5]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    Two questions. Firstly, would you agree that in the light of a major project such as this it would be surprising if it was not the case that there would be some changes in personnel and some clashes of personality along the way?
  • Jack Lemley (Supplementary) [11]

    • Question by: Brian Coleman
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    We understand that, Sir Roy, but Mr Neill has asked a specific question. I would be grateful if you could address it.
  • Jack Lemley (Supplementary) [12]

    • Question by: Brian Coleman
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    I do not think Mrs Howlett is suggesting that it did come from you. She is just asking if there is any truth in it?
  • Jack Lemley (Supplementary) [13]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    ): The second question is I fully understand that in the case of a `no fault divorce', which this is presented as, an agreed statement would be issued saying that everyone is walking away happy and there may be differences but we need to put it behind us and move on. However, would you not accept it is a reasonable democratic role for a body such as ourselves to delve into that a little further and see whether there is any voracity in various of the statements made about this, and how would you help us to do that? I...
  • Jack Lemley (Supplementary) [21]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    My final question is about money. Is there anything we need to know about the financial settlement associated with the departure of Mr Lemley? He was on a contract of something like £250,000 a year, maybe it was more than that.
  • Jack Lemley (Supplementary) [23]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    If you were to receive a number of written questions from the Assembly asking you to confirm or otherwise some of the more detailed points which seem to be squirming out in the press, would you be happy to receive those? Perhaps happy is not the right word.
  • Budget (Supplementary) [13]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    Could I ask you one other impossible question to answer then which is when you have finally negotiated with the Treasury your revised budgets for the Olympics, and we agree a sum, will that be a fixed sum which we can be confident to go forward with until 2012?
  • Budget (Supplementary) [14]

    • Question by: John Biggs
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    So at that time you will be a lot more relaxed about getting into detailed scrutiny with us about individual items within your budget?
  • Jack Lemley

    • Reference: 2006/0389-1
    • Question by: Brian Coleman
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    In his remarks to the Idaho Statesman, Jack Lemley said that political disputes will make the Olympics come in late and over budget. Is he telling the truth, or is he deliberately trying to mislead?
  • Budget

    • Reference: 2006/0391-1
    • Question by: Brian Coleman
    • Meeting date: 15 November 2006
    Mr Lemley was also concerned about soaring costs. Given that you are going to the Treasury to ask for extra money for the regeneration that was promised, why was the Olympic Delivery Authority not upfront about the real cost of the promised legacy from the outset?