Search questions

• Question by: Dee Doocey
• Meeting date: 21 October 2009

In retrospect, do you regret perhaps not negotiating more robustly - I am choosing my words with care - with the IOC over some of its more elitist demands? For example, we spent vast amounts of money upgrading the transport system but it is insisting that nearly half the people have got the right to use the roads.

• Question by: Dee Doocey
• Meeting date: 10 November 2007

I am not arguing with the principle. I am just trying to understand how many of the 70,000 volunteer places will actually be available if the sponsors take up their allocation and do not decide to give them to the community. How many are going to be available for the community? Is it 60,000, is it 50,000 or is it 65,000?

• Question by: Dee Doocey
• Meeting date: 10 November 2007

I will come on now to sponsorship. There have been reports in the press that sponsors are going to get an allocation of tickets, which is perfectly understandable. I suppose you share my view and hope that it will not be like Wembley, where so many of the tickets are sold to people who have no interest in football and have their back turned to the game. My main concern is it is also reported in the press that staff of sponsors are going to get the opportunity to have some of the volunteer places. First of all I want...

• Reference: 2007/0111-1
• Question by: Graham Tope
• Meeting date: 07 November 2007

What are the next steps for Safer Neighbourhood Teams in London?

• Question by: Dee Doocey
• Meeting date: 08 November 2006

Thank you. Could I deal perhaps with just two of the issues? First, I would like to talk about access via front counters. I think you rather glossed over this and, although you said they were not fit for purpose your suggestion, your suggestion was that the reason they were not fit for purpose was because they did not have enough people if you like serving behind the counters. Would you not agree that it is an appalling design, a total lack of customer focus from the people who are serving, ignoring the public, dirty front counters, no seats, long...

• Question by: Graham Tope
• Meeting date: 08 November 2006

The Police and Justice Bill - or Act as it very nearly is - will require every local authority to set up a Community Safety Scrutiny Committee which again will add to the complexities of the local arrangements we are discussing. How do you envisage that fitting in with the arrangements? How will it relate to the police consultative groups for instance?

• Reference: 2006/0338-1
• Question by: Graham Tope
• Meeting date: 08 November 2006

Have you secured agreement with the British Transport Police that Transport Safer Neighbourhood PCSOs will be permitted to patrol their `territory' without any restrictions?

• Reference: 2006/0360-1
• Question by: Graham Tope
• Meeting date: 08 November 2006

Do you agree that it is inappropriate for the MPS to classify some homicide cases as `A+' on the basis of expected media attention thus attracting a more resources (money and staff) towards the investigation? Would it not be better for this ACPO policy to be reviewed with a view to removing this external driver from homicide investigations?

• Reference: 2006/0361-1
• Question by: Graham Tope
• Meeting date: 08 November 2006

How many instances have been recorded where the MPS has lost evidence in each year since 2001? How many complaints for losing evidence have been lodged against the MPS by a) members of the public b) businesses in each year since 2001?

• Reference: 2006/0388-1
• Question by: Graham Tope
• Meeting date: 08 November 2006

How are you addressing the inconsistencies in the way Safer Neighbourhood Panels are operating across boroughs and London?