Search questions

• Question by: Jennette Arnold OBE
• Meeting date: 18 May 2011

Thank you. Ms Shawcross has the floor for a point of personal explanation because I am sure she will want to tell us she is not an outrider.

• Reference: 2007/0027-1
• Question by: Sally Hamwee
• Meeting date: 13 June 2007

What work have you done for Transport for London under your Consultancy Agreement?

• Reference: 2007/0028-1
• Question by: Sally Hamwee
• Meeting date: 13 June 2007

What is the purpose of the Consultancy Agreement between TfL and Bob Kiley and how does it offer value for money?

• Reference: 2007/0030-1
• Question by: Sally Hamwee
• Meeting date: 13 June 2007

Why was the Agreement structured so as to prevent TfL from being able to require Mr Kiley to work at TfL's offices after June 2007?

• Reference: 2007/0031-1
• Question by: Sally Hamwee
• Meeting date: 13 June 2007

What administrative, office and secretarial support has been provided to Bob Kiley under the Agreement? What has been the cost of this support?

• Reference: 2007/0032-1
• Question by: Sally Hamwee
• Meeting date: 13 June 2007

On how many occasions and for what purpose has TfL paid for air or rail travel for Mr Kiley under the Consultancy Agreement?

• Reference: 2007/0033-1
• Question by: Sally Hamwee
• Meeting date: 13 June 2007

Why are the records of Mr Kiley's expense claims incomplete? [No records of prior authorisation of expenses, no supporting information/evidence in support of the first three invoices, and lost receipt in relation to invoice No. 7]

• Reference: 2007/0034-1
• Question by: Sally Hamwee
• Meeting date: 13 June 2007

Why did TfL pay expenses for a dinner to plan a speech at the Salzburg Seminar (of which Bob Kiley is listed on the Salzburg Seminar website as a Fellow and former member of the Board of Directors) but no expenses for the seminar itself?

• Reference: 2002/0790
• Question by: Trevor Phillips
• Meeting date: 20 November 2002

Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. This morning because of the Fire Service dispute, I intend to use my powers under Standing Order 2.40 first to take an item of urgent business, which is a statement from the Chair of LFEPA and to vary the order of business to take that first. I imagine the Mayor, when he arrives, will also want to say something on this matter, as part of his update. What I intend to do is to allow 25 minutes of questions on the Mayor's update during which period questions will also be addressed to the Chair of...

• Question by: Mike Tuffrey
• Meeting date: 20 November 2002

Would the Chair of LFEPA accept that from the Liberal Democrats side we have been supportive of the basic position that more money is possible and is justified but only in return for modernised working practices? And if so, will she accept that too few people in the public, in the media, actually understand the extent of the current practices and what is required? Will she agree to make it clearer exactly what changes we are asking for in terms of working practices? Because most people simply do not understand how inflexible they are. As far as the Mayor is...