Search questions

• Question by: Tony Arbour
• Meeting date: 05 December 2007

My office has been in discussion with South West Trains and they would be perfectly happy for ' clearly because it is extra custom ' their tracks to be used. Has there been discussion over dual use of tracks for any further extension of the line really anywhere in London, not just in this particular patch?

• Question by: Brian Coleman
• Meeting date: 05 December 2007

Commissioner, I am not as obsessed with the Cross River Tram as Ms Shawcross, or indeed as many of my Labour council colleagues in Camden, who are obsessed with the Cross River Tram, in the complete opposite direction from Ms Shawcross. Will you accept that there are serious concerns about this development in South Camden, in Somers Town and Bloomsbury, and other areas that the proposal passes through? Many people do not consider it a solution to overcrowding on the Northern Line, which again I experienced this morning, having to stand all the way from Finchley Central to London Bridge...

• Question by: Angie Bray
• Meeting date: 05 December 2007

This is all waste material left over from the floods, making it very slippery, and there is a lot of urinating in the tunnel underneath and a lot of bird droppings, which are making it incredibly dangerous to walk through.

• Question by: Angie Bray
• Meeting date: 05 December 2007

Can I write to you about that then?

• Question by: Brian Coleman
• Meeting date: 05 December 2007

On the subject of security at stations, are you aware, Commissioner, of the security problem of criminals fitting scanning devices on chip and pin machines at our tube station? We have had two at West Finchley in the last few weeks. They seem to have moved on from banks to tube stations. Will you be taking appropriate action? Sally Hamwee (Chair): I think the question is, 'and will you make sure it does not go onto the London Overground?' Brian Coleman (Deputy Chairman): Indeed.

• Question by: Angie Bray
• Meeting date: 05 December 2007

I wondered whether the remit of the staff on the Overground will be in part to look after and maintain the bridges over which the overland trains run. I have had my attention drawn to a particular bridge where it is in a disgraceful state of disrepair and the flood damage from the summer has not even been touched yet. Is that something which now falls to the staff of the Overground or is that still a Network Rail issue?

• Question by: Roger Evans
• Meeting date: 05 December 2007

Why did you remove the 95% debt guarantee? Surely that would mean that no one else would want to bid for it? It would effectively leave TfL as the only bidder.

• Question by: Roger Evans
• Meeting date: 05 December 2007

I am referring to the 95% guarantee following the demise of Metronet, because up to that point 95% of the debts were guaranteed by the public, which was the price that was paid to get the private sector involved in the first place. If that guarantee is not in place, then it ensures that Transport for London are the only people who bid, but it does not necessarily make it any cheaper, because it also ensures that you pick up all the debt.

• Question by: Roger Evans
• Meeting date: 05 December 2007

It would be useful to have a briefing on this at some point, but can I just ask about prosecution rates, because we put a question to the Mayor at the last Question Time about the number of people referred for prosecution, as to the number of people who actually made it there. Now, the conviction rate is quite good against the number of people who go to court. In fact it is very good, but only 20% of people recommended for prosecution actually make it into court. Why is that?

• Question by: Roger Evans
• Meeting date: 05 December 2007

Over two hours of checking tickets on the number 25 at Stratford, a number of people were found not to have paid their fare. What do you think that number would be?